Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Ingham County

Court

Ingham County

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-07
Status CLOSED
Docket 31 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Treas Dept Mi
Defendant Danny Taft
Photo of Hon. Wanda Stokes

Judge

Hon. Wanda Stokes

Ingham County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. COMPLAINT FILED RECEIPT: 519826 DATE: 03/07/2024 RECEIPT 519826 REVERSED BY 519827 ON 03/07/2024. APPLIED TO WRONG FEE RECEIPT: 519829 DATE: 03/07/2024
  2. CASE CLOSED C30
  3. ORDER OF DISMISSAL - THIS ORDER RESOLVES THE LAST PENDING CLAIM AND CLOSES THE CASE
  4. SUMMONS RETURNED--BY REG. CERT MAIL UPON DANNY TAFT AND SCHERYL TAFT ON 3/22/2024
  5. C30 ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FEE RECEIPT: 519826 DATE: 03/07/2024 RECEIPT 519826 REVERSED BY 519827 ON 03/07/2024. APPLIED TO WRONG FEE
  6. SUMMONS ISSUED
  7. JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLT TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT
  8. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER W/POS
  9. APPEARANCE OF MATTHEW R WARMBIR
  10. NOTICE OF PRETRIAL AND JURY TRIAL W/ PS
  11. SCHEDULING ORDER DONE THE FOLLOWING EVENT: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/13/2024 AT 8:00 AM HAS BEEN RESULTED AS FOLLOWS: RESULT: SCHEDULING ORDER DONE JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: MASON COURTHOUSE RESULT STAFF: STAFF: CO0001
  12. HEARING SET: EVENT: JURY TRIAL CIVIL DATE: 07/07/2025 TIME: 8:30 AM JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: MASON COURTHOUSE RESULT: CANCELLED
  13. HEARING SET: EVENT: PRETRIAL DATE: 06/12/2025 TIME: 8:30 AM JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: MASON COURTHOUSE RESULT: CANCELLED
  14. PROOF OF SERVICE RE: DEFS FCA US LLC AND CHAMPION DODGE CJD RAM'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  15. PROOF OF SERVICE RE: ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION COUNSEL
  16. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  17. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  18. HEARING SET: EVENT: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DATE: 06/13/2024 TIME: 8:00 AM JUDGE: STOKES, WANDA M. LOCATION: MASON COURTHOUSE RESULT: SCHEDULING ORDER DONE
  19. ORDER AND NOTICE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE W/ PS
  20. DEF US LLC'S ANSWER TO PLTF'S COMPLAINT, SPECIAL AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND JURY DEMAND (PROOF OF SERVICE UNSIGNED)
  21. APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEF FCA LLC W/ PS
  22. JURY FEE PAID RECEIPT: 520949 DATE: 04/04/2024
  23. JURY DEMAND W/ PS
  24. APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEF CHAMPION
  25. DEF CHAMPION CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE RAM OF LANSING'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT W/ AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  26. PROOF OF SERVICE RE: DEF CHAMPION'S APPEARANCE, ANSWER TO COMPLAINT, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  27. PROOF OF SERVICE: SUMMONS- STELLANTIS CORPORATION CERT MAIL 3/11/24
  28. PROOF OF SERVICE: SUMMONS- CHAMPION DODGE/ MATT STRAND CERT MAIL ON 3/8/24
  29. PROOF OF SERVICE RE: COMPLAINT
  30. C30 ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FEE RECEIPT: 519747 DATE: 03/05/2024
  31. SUMMONS ISSUED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more