Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-10
Status CLOSED
Type Dr Never Married
Docket 30 entries
Disposition other terminations

Parties

Plaintiff Wittensoldner, Cody
Defendant Edwards, Rebecca L

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DEPOSIT - RCVD FROM ATTY ESKRIDGE Receipt: 84735 Date: 02/10/2017
  2. COMPLAINT/MOTION FOR INITIAL ALLOCATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS & RESPON, FOR AN ORDER OF CUSTODY TO FATHER & VISIT TO MOTHER, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR AN ORDER OF SHARED PARENTING FILED BY ATTY EASKRIDGE Receipt: 85108 Date: 04/06/2017
  3. CUSTODY AFFIDAVIT
  4. COMPUTERIZATION FEE Receipt: 85108 Date: 04/06/2017
  5. COMPUTERIZED RESEARCH Receipt: 85108 Date: 04/06/2017
  6. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  7. CIVIL COMPLAINT ASSIGNMENT
  8. SUMMONS ANSWER AND NOTICE OF PRETRIAL HEARING FOR 04-03-17 AT 2:00 PM Receipt: 85108 Date: 04/06/2017
  9. Issue Date: 02/13/2017 Service: SUMMONS FOR ANSWER W NOH FOR 04-03-17 AT 2PM & MOT FOR INITIAL ALLOC OF PAREN RIGHTS & RESPON, FOR AN ORDER OF CUSTODY TO FATHER & VISIT TO MOTHER OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR AN ORDER OF SHARED PARENTING(J) Method: PERSONAL SERVICE (JUV) Provider: BAILIFF Cost Per: $ EDWARDS, REBECCA L 7721 VIRGINIA RD ATWATER, OH 44201 Tracking No: P000022610
  10. HEARING SET: Event: A CIVIL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE-NOTICE TO: CODY WITTENSOLDNER JAMES ESKRIDGE Date: 04/03/2017 Time: 2:00 pm Judge: LYLE, ROXANA R. Location: Portage County Juvenile Court Result: RESET Result: RESET Receipt: 85108 Date: 04/06/2017
  11. NOTICE OF FILING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PATERNITY AFFID., FILED BY Attorney: ESKRIDGE, JAMES R (84439)
  12. SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : PERSONAL SERVICE (JUV) Issued : 02/13/2017 Service : SUMMONS FOR ANSWER (J) Served : 03/01/2017 Return : 03/01/2017 On : EDWARDS, REBECCA L Signed By : MOTHER OF REBECCA EDWARDS Reason : (JUV) SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : Tracking #: P000022610
  13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION SIGNED BY REBECCA EDWARDS AND CODY WITTENSOLDNER
  14. HEARING SET: The following event: A CIVIL PRETRIAL scheduled for 04/03/2017 at 2:00 pm has been reset to a HRG ON AGREED ENTRY: Event: A HEARING ON AGREED ENTRY NOTICE TO: CODY T WITTENSOLDNER REBECCA L EDWARDS JAMES R ESKRIDGE Date: 04/03/2017 Time: 2:00 pm Judge: LYLE, ROXANA R. Location: Portage County Juvenile Court Receipt: 85108 Date: 04/06/2017
  15. MAGISTRATE'S DEC./ORDER, 04-03-17 AGREED ENTRY UPON FATHER'S MOTION FOR ALLOCATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS & RESPON. MOTHER, REBECCA EDWARDS APPEARED PRO-SE. FATHER, CODY WITTENSOLDNER APPEARED REPRES BY ATTY ESKRIDGE. PARTIES HAVE COME TO A COMPLETE AGREEMENT ON ALL OUTSTANDING ISSUES TO BE EMBODIED BY THE COURT IN THIS AGREED ENTRY & THE PARTIES AGREE IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THEIR CHILD. FATHER SIGNED THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PATERN EST A FATHER & CHILD RELATIONSHIP. PARTIES AGREE THEY ARE BOTH THE LC & R/P OF THE CHILD WITH MOTHER BEING THE R/P FOR SCHOOL PURPOSES. THE SHARED PARENTING PLAN ATTACHED HERETO IS ADOPTED BY THE COURT. FATHER IS THE CHILD SUPPT OBLIGOR. EFFECT 04-03-17 WHEN PRIV HEALTH INS IS BEING PROV, FATHER SHALL PAY CHILD SUPPT IN THE AMT OF $365.99/MO PER CHILD + 2% PROC CHRG. ON THE 1ST DAY OF THE MONTH WHEN PRIV HEALTH INS IS NOT BEING PROV, FATHER SHALL PAY CHILD SUPPT IN THE AMT OF $35.05/MO PER CHILD + 2% PROC CHRG AND CASH MEDIAL SUPPT IN THE AMT OF $82.50/MO PER CHILD (1) + 2% PROC CHRG. CHILD SUPPT IS DEVIATED TO FATHER PAYING $0.00/MO PER CHILD (1) + 2% PROC CHRG. THE DEVIATION SHALL NOT SERVE AS BASIS FOR DEVIATING THE CASH MEDICAL OBLIG. NEITHER PARENT CURRENTLY HAS HEALTH INS AVAIL TO THEM AT A REAS COSTS. FATHER SHALL BE RESPON FOR 50% OF THE UNINSURED HEALTH CARE NEEDS OF THE CHILD & MOTHER SHALL BE RESPON FOR 50%. FATHER SHALL CLAIM THE CHILD FOR FEDERAL & STATE INCOME TAX PURPOSES & MOTHER SHALL CLAIM THE CHILD FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT. ALL PENDING MOTIONS NOT OTHERWISE ADDRESSED HEREIN ARE HEREBY DISMISSED. COSTS OVER & ABOVE THE DEPOSIT HEREIN TO THE FATHER. COPY TO CSEA, R. EDWARDS, ATTY ESKRIDGE (2) (5 PROV) Receipt: 85108 Date: 04/06/2017
  16. PURS. TO JRLE 01-28-94 JUV COURT DOES NOT REFUND OR BILL ACCTS BALANCING LESS/MORE THAN $5.00 Receipt: 85108 Date: 04/06/2017
  17. MOTION FOR EMERGENCY EX PARTE CUSTODY HEARING W/AFFIDAVIT ATTACHED FILED ON BEHALF OF CODY WITTENSOLDNER BY: Attorney: COFFMAN, BRIAN L (69568)
  18. COMPUTERIZED RESEARCH
  19. COMPUTERIZATION FEE
  20. JUV SPECIAL PROJ FUND
  21. JOURNAL ENTRY. ON 7/05/19 THE PETITIONER, CODY WITTENSOLDNER, FILED A MOTION FOR EMERGENCY EX PARTE HEARING, WITH A COPY OF SHARED PARENTING PLAN ATTACHED. AN AGREED JOURNAL ENTRY ADOPTING SHARED PARENTING PLAN WAS FILED IN THIS COURT ON 4/05/17. NO PROOF OF SERVICE OR IFS WERE FILED WITH THE MOTION. NO UCCJEA AFFIDAVIT WITH UPDATED ADDRESSES AND INFORMATION WAS FILED WITH THE MOTION. PETITIONER-FATHER ALLEGES IRREPARABLE HARM TO THE CHILD AND ALLUDES TO SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM TO THE CHILD. NO FACTS SUPPORTING THE MOTION ARE VERIFIED BY AFFIDAVIT, ONLY MERE SPECULATION OF HARM TO THE CHILD IF MOTHER MOVES TO HER MOTHER'S HOME IN ALLIANCE, OHIO. PETITIONER-FATHER DOES ALLEGE THAT MOTHER INTENDS TO IGNORE PARA 24 OF SHARED PARENTING AGREEMENT WHICH REQUIRES THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO RELOCATE BE FILED PRIOR TO CHANGE OF RESIDENCY. THAT ACTION IS EASILY REMEDIED BY MOTION AND/OR MOTION FOR CONTEMPT WITHOUT PROVIDING FOR AN EX PARTE ORDER. MOREOVER, PETIONER-FATHER ALLEGES MOTHER IS STILL COHABITATING WITH HIM AT HIS HOME.NO ALLEGATION HAS BEEN MADE AS TO REPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OR PORTAGE COUNTY DEPT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICE IN REGARDS TO EMERGENCY REMOVAL. THE MOTION FOR AN EX PARTE ORDER AND/OR EMERGENCY EX PARTE CUSTY HEARING IS HEREBY DENIED. PETIONER-FATHER MAY FILE AN AMENDED MOTION FOR CUSTODY OR CONTEMPT UPON FILING OF UPDATED AFFIDAVITS. COPY TO ATTY COFFMAN, CODY WITTENSOLDNER & REBECCA EDWARDS & CSEA
  22. BATCH SCAN: COMPLETE FILE
  23. JOURNAL ENTRY: AN ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO R.C. 2301.03(P) OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE.
  24. (CSEA) JUDGMENT ENTRY - ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER FILED.
  25. (CSEA) JUDGMENT ENTRY FILED.
  26. CSEA DISPOSITION.
  27. OPY ISSUED TO DOMESTIC COURT.
  28. ERMINATION OF SUPPORT PAYMENTS TO PO CTY WELFARE DEPT FILED (R58).
  29. SEA NOTICE OF RULE 58 ISSUED TO ATTYS/PARTIES BY REGULAR MAIL OR FACSIMILE CODY WITTENSOLDNER (PLAINTIFF); CSEA RULE 58 (NOTICE) Sent on: 04/23/2024 10:40:55.93 CODY WITTENSOLDNER (PLAINTIFF);
  30. SEA NOTICE OF RULE 58 ISSUED TO ATTYS/PARTIES BY REGULAR MAIL OR FACSIMILE REBECCA L EDWARDS (DEFENDANT);

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.