Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- PETITION ($10,001 OR MORE)
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
- LENGTHY TRIAL FUND FEE
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE - BRENDAN MCHUGH
- SCHEDULING ORDER
- JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND ALL DEADLINES
- JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND ALL DEADLINES
- ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S PETITION
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
- MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY
- MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
- JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND ALL DEADLINES
- ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND ALL DEADLINES
- AGREED ORDER ON MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
- DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
- ORDER SETTING HEARING
- DS 12-15-22 HAKE; JUDGE HAKE PHONED; M/TO COMPEL
- STRICKEN
- PLAINTIFF TYLER SCOTT PAULSEN'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S
- MOTION TO COMPEL
- MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING
- ORDER STRIKING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL
- DISOVERY
- JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
- ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
- MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR SPOILATION OF EVIDENCE AND
- DEMAND FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
- DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
- SANCTIONS FOR SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE
- ORDER-HEARING CONTINUED TO 5/11/23 @9:30AM IN BRISTOW
- ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT ECJA
- NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In