Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-04
Status Closed
Type Zad Appeal From Planning Board, G.l. Chapter 41, 81 Bb
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bristol Bros. Development Corp.
Defendant Town Of Weymouth Planning Board|Williams, Sandra|Rotondo, Paul|Agnew, Gregory|Christian, Rob|Faust, Ben|Luongo, Robert J.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. tipulation of Dismissal - Mass.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(ii)
  2. ase assigned to the Fast Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
  3. and Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 428879 Date: 03/04/2022
  4. and Court surcharge Receipt: 428879 Date: 03/04/2022
  5. and Court summons Receipt: 428879 Date: 03/04/2022
  6. niform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  7. he case has been assigned to the F Track. Notice sent. Notice of Judge and Track Assignment was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Mark S Bourbeau, Esq. [email protected] null: File Copy Sent On: 03/08/2022 09:30:19
  8. vent Scheduled Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Event: Case Management Conference Date: 03/31/2022 Time: 12:00 PM
  9. ppearance of Christopher H Heep, Esq., Donna Marie Brewer, Esq., Ethan B Dively, Esq. for Town of Weymouth Planning Board, Sandra Williams Member of the Weymouth Planning Board, Paul Rotondo Member of the Weymouth Planning Board, Gregory Agnew Member of the Weymouth Planning Board, Rob Christian Member of the Weymouth Planning Board, Ben Faust Member of the Weymouth Planning Board, filed
  10. oint Statement, Motion to Consolidate Cases Related by Common Questions of Fact and Law, and Motion to Continue Case Management Conference, filed.
  11. vent Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 03/31/2022 12:00 PM Has been: Continued Hon. Michael D. Vhay, Presiding
  12. he Court GRANTS the parties' motion to reschedule the case-management conference in this matter to April 29, 2022, at 10:00 AM. See related order in Case No. 22 MISC 000151. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Mark S Bourbeau, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Christopher H Heep, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Donna Marie Brewer, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Ethan B Dively, Esq. [email protected] null: File Copy Sent On: 03/31/2022 09:28:56
  13. vent Scheduled Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Event: Case Management Conference Date: 04/29/2022 Time: 10:00 AM
  14. otion of David Mirabelli and Jennifer Mirabelli to Intervene Pursuant to M.R.C.P. 24(a) and (b) (Memorandum Incorporated), filed.
  15. he Court has received the Mirabellis' Motion to Intervene. The Court ORDERS the parties to file by April 22, 2022, any opposition to the motion. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Mark S Bourbeau, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Christopher H Heep, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Donna Marie Brewer, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Ethan B Dively, Esq. [email protected] null: File Copy Sent On: 04/08/2022 14:35:05
  16. andowner Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Intervene, filed.
  17. he Court has received Bristol Bros.'s opposition to the Mirabellis' motion to intervene. The Court ORDERS the parties and the Mirabellis to appear by telephone on April 29, 2022 at 10:00 AM (the same time as the case-management conference in these cases) for a hearing on the motion. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry sent to counsel by email.
  18. arties' Joint Statement, filed.
  19. vent Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 04/29/2022 10:00 AM Has been: Held via telephone Hon. Michael D. Vhay, Presiding
  20. lternative Dispute Resolution: Early Intervention Event held. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D.
  21. elephonic case management conference, initial intervention event, and hearing on the Mirabellis' motion to intervene held. All parties appeared through counsel. Moving parties the Mirabellis also appeared through counsel. Jennifer and David Mirabelli were also present. Plaintiff Bristol Bros. appeals the defendant Town of Weymouth Planning Board's denial of an ANR endorsement, which Bristol Bros. asserts should have been granted. The Board claims that the denial of the endorsement was lawful. After hearing arguments, the Court DENIES the Mirabellis' motion to intervene, without prejudice to its renewal, for the reasons stated on the record. See also Massachusetts Fed'n of Teachers, AFT, AFL-CIO v. School Comm. of Chelsea, 409 Mass. 203, 209 (1991) (private party has the right to intervene in support of a government entity's decision only if the moving party shows the government "has colluded with the opposing party or has failed to fulfill its duty of representation" defending its decision). By agreement of Bristol Bros. and the municipal defendants, the Court ORDERS (1) Bristol Bros. to file by June 24, 2022, a motion for summary judgment on all issues in this case and (2) the Board to file by July 22, 2022, any opposition to that motion and any cross-motion for summary judgment. The Court advised the parties and the Mirabellis that the Court will send all notices and orders in this case by electronic mail. The parties and the Mirabellis assent to filing all materials with the Court, and serving such materials on each other, by email. SO ORDERED. Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Mark S Bourbeau, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Jeffery A Tocchio, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: William Prescott Golding, Jr., Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Christopher H Heep, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Donna Marie Brewer, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Ethan B Dively, Esq. [email protected] Defendant Intervenor: Matthew J Dunn, Esq. [email protected] Defendant Intervenor: Christopher J Davidson, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Town of Weymouth Planning Board No addresses available null: File Copy Sent On: 04/29/2022 11:13:24
  22. laintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed.
  23. laintiff's Statement of Material Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, filed.
  24. laintiff's Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, filed.
  25. ertificate of Service, filed.
  26. oint Motion for Remand, filed.
  27. rder Remanding Case to Town of Weymouth Planning Board, issued. (Copies emailed to Attorneys William Golding, Jeffery Tocchio, Mark Bourbeau, Ethan Dively, Donna Brewer, Christopher Heep, Christopher Davidson, and Matthew Dunn) Judge: Vhay, Hon. Michael D.
  28. tipulation of Dismissal (Mass. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1)(ii)), filed.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more