Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-02
Type Dismissed
Docket 46 entries
Disposition dismissed
Photo of Hon. Thomas Linda S

Judge

Hon. Thomas Linda S

Nowata County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. FILE & ENTER PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  4. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  5. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  6. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  7. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  8. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  9. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  10. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  11. EMERGENCY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER, ISSUED W/NOTICE OF HEARING DATE 4-16-24 @ 2PM
  12. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  13. EMERGENCY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER, RETD SERVED
  14. CM:VACLAW-PLTF W/ATTY K PERSAUD-DEFT PRO SE. CRT FINDS THE CHILDREN ARE NOT RELATED TO THE DEFT AND ARE REMOVED FROM THE EPO AT THIS TIME. CRT FINDS THE PLTF IS ALLOWED TO RETAIN POSSESSION OF THE RESIDENCE AT THIS TIME. CRT CONSOLIDATES THIS CASE W/FD-19-14, AND ORDERS THE PARTIES BACK 5/31/24 @ 9:00AM W/JUDGE FRANKS. (KM)
  15. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE & EXTENSION OF EX-PARTE
  16. PROTECTIVE ORDER (5/31/24 @ 9:00AM W/JUDGE FRANKS) (KM)
  17. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD (COPY/ORIG FD-19-14)
  18. ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL OF RECORD (K PERSAUD FOR PETIT) (COPY/ORIG FD-19-14)
  19. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  20. CM:SIGLER-PETIT BY K PERSAUD-RESP PRO SE. MR. PERSAUD ADDRESSES MOTION TO W/D AS COUNSEL FOR PETIT. NO OBJECTION FROM RESP. CRT GRANTS. MR. DELAPP ENTERS APPEARANCE FOR PETIT. MATTER PASSED TO 6.6 @ 1:30PM W/JUDGE THOMAS. TRAILING EPO REMAINS IN FULL FORCE & EFFECT. (WG)
  21. CM:SIGLER-DEFT MADE A PMT AND WAS ORDERED BACK 9/20/24 AT 1:30PM
  22. CM:THOMAS-PETIT W/ATTY C DELAPP-RESP PRO SE. MATTER IS CONTINUED. TRAILING EPO'S (PO-24-50 & PO-24-73) REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. PARTIES ORDERED BACK 7-18-24 @ 1:30 PM. (TB)
  23. CM:THOMAS-DELAPP-MATTER IS PASSED TO 8-15-24 @ 1:30 PM. TRAILING EPO'S (PO-24-50 & PO-24-73) REMAIN IN FULL FORCE & EFFECT. (TB)
  24. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE & EXTENSION OF EX-PARTE
  25. PROTECTIVE ORDER (8-15-24 @ 1:30 PM) (TB)
  26. CM:THOMAS-PLTF W/ATTY C DELAPP-DEFT PRO SE. MATTER IS SET TO TRAIL FD-19-14. EPO REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. MATTER IS CONTINUED AND PARTIES ORDERED BACK 10-3-24 @ 1:30 PM. (TB)
  27. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE & EXTENSION OF EX-PARTE
  28. PROTECTIVE ORDER (10-3-24 @ 1:30 PM) (TB)
  29. CM:THOMAS-MATTER IS SET TO TRAIL FD-19-14. EPO REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT W/MODIFICATION TO ALLOW PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION. MATTER IS CONTINUED. PARTIES ORDERED BACK 12-5-24 @ 1:30 PM. (TB)
  30. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE AND EXTENSION OF EX-PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER (12-5-24 @ 1:30 PM) (TB)
  31. ORDER SUSPENDING ORDER OF PROTECTION FOR ATTENDANCE OF MEDIATION (COPY/ORIG FD-19-14)
  32. CM:THOMAS-PETIT W/ATTY C DELAPP-RESP PRO SE. MATTER COMES ON FOR STATUS CONFERENCE/MEDIATION STATUS. ATTY DELAPP ADVISES MATTER HAS BEEN SETTLED THROUGH MEDIATION. CRT FINDS IT HAS JURISDICTION AND DISSOLVES MARRIAGE BASED UPON INCOMPATIBILITY. CRT DIVIDES THE PROPERTY & DEBT PER AGREEMENT - AS SET FORTH IN DECREE. PETIT RESTORED TO FORMER NAME OF: DROWATZKY. CRT FINDS RESP IS TO GET VEHICLE IN HIS NAME BY MONDAY. CRT DISMISSES PO-24-50 & PO-24-73 PER AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES WITH UNDERSTANDING OF NO CONTACT. (TB)
  33. ORDER OF DISMISSAL (TB)
  34. DISMISSED - FILE & ENTER PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  35. DISMISSED -
  36. DISMISSED -
  37. DISMISSED - OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  38. DISMISSED - OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  39. DISMISSED - 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  40. DISMISSED - OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  41. DISMISSED - 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  42. DISMISSED - COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  43. DISMISSED - 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  44. DISMISSED - STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  45. DISMISSED - 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more