Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-14
Type Fc Adult Abuse Stalking
Docket 24 entries
Disposition Tried by Court-Civil

Parties

Defendant Sterling, Andrew
Photo of Hon. Allen Harvey Shane

Judge

Hon. Allen Harvey Shane

Carter County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Ord of Protection Served Document ID - 24-AFOP-53; Served To - ANDREW STERLING; Served Date - 03/29/2024; Served Time - 22:59:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -
  3. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  4. JFULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  5. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  6. Protection Order Issued Document ID: 24-AFOP-53, for STERLING, ANDREW.
  7. JFULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  8. Judmt Full Order Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Original Expiration Date - 28-MAR-2025; Renewal Expiration Date - 28-MAR-2026; Original Motion to Object Date - 28-FEB-2025; Resp not to enter or stay - YES
  9. Full Order of Protection
  10. Tried by Court-Civil
  11. Adult Abuse Hearing Held Petitioner and Respondent appear pro se. Evidence is heard. The Court finds that Petitioner resides in Oregon County, Missouri; that the parties previously resided together; that Respondent engaged in a course of conduct that included threats of bombing and burning Respondent's home without justification; and that Petitioner has a reasonable concern for his safety and well-being. The Court enters a full order of protection for a term of two years with automatic renewal. Harvey S. Allen Associated Entries: 03/14/2024 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 03/28/2024; 1:00 PM; HARVEY SHANE ALLEN; Oregon
  12. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  13. Filing: PROTECTION ORDER RETURN. ao
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Ord of Protection Served Document ID - 24-AEOP-143; Served To - STERLING, ANDREW [; Server - [Not Provided]; Served Date - 18-Mar-2024; Served Time - 11:10:00; Service Type - EE; Reason Description - Served
  16. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  17. OEXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order was submitted for electronic processing
  18. ExParte Order of Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES
  19. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  20. CRIFS/Unredacted Document
  21. Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed
  22. Ex Parte Order Issued Document ID: 24-AEOP-143, for STERLING, ANDREW.
  23. Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 03/28/2024 - Adult Abuse Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 03/28/2024; 1:00 PM; HARVEY SHANE ALLEN; Oregon
  24. Pet for Protection Ord Filed PET Relationship to RES - ACQUAINTANCE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more