Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-12-08
Status Consolidated
Type 45 Unlimited Medical Malpractice
Docket 136 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Barnard, Mardi|View Document 4/4/24 S' Notice Of Posting Jury Fees|View Document 4/4/24 S' Notice Of Posting Jury Fees
Defendant The Regents Of The University Of California|Fresno Community Hospital And Medical Center|Central California Faculty Medical Group, Inc.|George Zakhary, Dds, Md, Facs|Christopher Alan Chan, Dds|Rachna Shenoy Casteel, Dds
Photo of Hon. Skiles Jon M

Judge

Hon. Skiles Jon M

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  39. Served
  40. Summons and Complaint
  41. Served
  42. Government Exemption Claimed
  43. Answer Filed
  44. View Document Answer
  45. Demand for Jury Trial filed
  46. View Document DEFTS Demand for Jury Trial
  47. Comment Demand for Jury trial
  48. Notice Filed
  49. View Document DEFTS Notice of Jury Deposit
  50. Comment Notice of Deposit of Jury Fees
  51. Declaration Filed
  52. View Document Declaration Regarding Designation of Trial Counsel
  53. Comment Declaration Regarding Designation of Trial Counsel
  54. Notice Filed
  55. View Document Notice of Related Case
  56. Comment Notice of Related Case No. 22CECG01833; No. 22CECG02401; No. 23CECG05060
  57. Proof of Service
  58. View Document Proof of Service
  59. Summons and Complaint
  60. Served
  61. Notice Filed
  62. View Document Notice of Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure 1010.6
  63. Comment of Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure 1010.6
  64. Answer Filed
  65. View Document - Answer/Response/Denial/Demurrer - First Appearance Fee
  66. Notice Filed
  67. View Document - Notice of Related Cases
  68. Comment Notice of Related Cases - 22CECG01833; 22CECG02401; 23CECG05060
  69. Case Management Statement Filed
  70. View Document Case Management Statement - HRG 04/16/24
  71. Comment HRG
  72. Notice Filed
  73. View Document 3-28-24 Notice of Compliance with CCP 1010.6
  74. Comment Notice of Compliance with CCP 1010.6
  75. Case Management Statement Filed
  76. View Document 4-2-24 Case Management Statement
  77. Comment HRG
  78. Case Management Statement Filed
  79. View Document Case Management Statement
  80. Comment HRG
  81. Notice Filed
  82. View Document Plaintiffs' Notice of Posting Jury Fees
  83. Comment Plaintiffs' Notice of Posting Jury Fees
  84. Notice Filed
  85. View Document Notice of Posting Jury Fee Deposit Fresno CMC
  86. Comment Notice of Posting Jury Fee Deposit
  87. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  88. View Document - Notice of Remote Appearance
  89. Comment Party: Rebecca Blackstone Lowell Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  90. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  91. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  92. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  93. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  94. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  95. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  96. View Document - Proposed Remote Appearance Order Received
  97. View Document - Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  98. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  99. Comment Party: Rebecca Blackstone Lowell Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  100. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  101. Comment Emailed to: [email protected]; [email protected]
  102. Case Management Conference
  103. Original Type Case Management Conference
  104. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  105. Hearing Time 3:00 PM
  106. Result Heard
  107. Minute Order Attachment
  108. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  109. Remote Appearance Via Courtcall
  110. Comment Appearance by S. Dias for Plaintiff, Appearance by D. Wainwright for Defendant
  111. Jury Trial Requested by Both Parties
  112. Comment Estimated time for trial is 14 days
  113. Referral to ADR
  114. Notice of Hearing
  115. View Document GN-23 Notice of Calendar Setting
  116. View Document GN-23 Notice of Calendar Setting
  117. View Document GN-23 Notice of Calendar Setting
  118. Comment OSC HRG Moved to Dept. 97E
  119. Stipulation and Order filed
  120. View Document Stipulation and Order filed
  121. Judicial Officer Culver Kapetan, Kristi
  122. Comment Stipulation and Order to Consolidate Cases for All Purposes: 23CECG05060 and 23CECG05065
  123. OSC - ADR Stipulation
  124. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G
  125. Hearing Time 3:02 PM
  126. Cancel Reason Consolidated
  127. Mandatory Settlement Conference
  128. Hearing Time 10:00 AM
  129. Cancel Reason Consolidated
  130. Trial Readiness
  131. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  132. Hearing Time 9:30 AM
  133. Cancel Reason Consolidated
  134. Jury Trial
  135. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  136. Hearing Time 9:00 AM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more