Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-28
Type A 66 Appeals Inland Wetlands & Conservation Commission Local
Docket 57 entries
Disposition judgment of dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Kraig F. Schulz
Defendant Conservation Commission Of The Town Of Fairfield|Matthew D Hudson|Michelle A. Hudson
Photo of Hon. HON DALE RADCLIFFE

Judge

Hon. HON DALE RADCLIFFE

Fairfield County (CT)

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. RETURN OF SERVICE
  4. OMPLAINT
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. ONTINUATION OF PARTIES
  7. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 5/16/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  8. RDER RESULT: Granted 5/16/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  9. RDER RESULT: Order 6/6/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  10. ETURN OF RECORD
  11. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 6/12/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  12. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/12/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  13. BJECTION TO MOTION Objection to Motion for Continuance RESULT: Overruled 7/8/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  14. RDER RESULT: Overruled 7/8/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  15. CHEDULING ORDER
  16. BJECTION TO MOTION Objection to Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement the Record RESULT: Sustained 7/8/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  17. RDER RESULT: Sustained 7/8/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  18. OTION FOR ORDER Plaintiff's Motion Supplement Record RESULT: Denied 7/8/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  19. RDER RESULT: Denied 7/8/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  20. BJECTION TO MOTION RESULT: Sustained 7/8/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  21. RDER RESULT: Sustained 7/8/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  22. EPLY Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Objection to Supplement the Record
  23. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Motion for Summary Judgement in Case No. FBT-CV24-5054401-S RESULT: Denied 8/6/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  24. RDER RESULT: Denied 8/6/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  25. RDER RESULT: Order 8/29/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  26. RIEF Plaintiff's Brief
  27. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Request to Mark Status Conference as "off"
  28. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  29. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/12/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  30. NSWER
  31. NSWER
  32. RIEF Appeal Brief of the Defendants Matthew and Michelle Hudson
  33. RIEF Defendant's Brief
  34. EPLY Reply by Plaintiff to Defendant's Response Regarding Plaintiff's Brief
  35. EPLY Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Brief
  36. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE Motion for Continuance RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  37. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  38. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  39. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  40. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  41. RDER RESULT: Order 11/14/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  42. EQUEST TO BRING AUDIO/VISUAL EQUIPMENT INTO THE COURTHOUSE (JD-CL-90) Plaintiff's Request to Bring Items Into the Courthouse RESULT: Denied 12/3/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  43. RDER RESULT: Denied 12/3/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  44. EMORANDUM Plaintiff's Amended Brief with ROR References
  45. MENDMENT Plaintiff's Amended Response to Defendant (Town) with ROR References
  46. IST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  47. EMORANDUM OF DECISION RESULT: Order 1/30/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  48. UDGMENT OF DISMISSAL RESULT: HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  49. OTION TO REARGUE/RECONSIDER Motion to Reargue Memorandum of Decision No. 129.00 RESULT: Denied 2/18/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  50. RDER RESULT: Denied 2/18/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  51. OMPLAINT Preliminary Statement of the Issues
  52. EMORANDUM Designation of the Proposed Contents of the Clerk
  53. ERTIFICATE OF NO TRANSCRIPT NEEDED Notice of Appeal Transcript Order
  54. RIEF Docketing Statement
  55. PPEAL TO APPELLATE COURT
  56. ETITION FOR CERTIFICATION
  57. PPELLATE COURT DECISION APPEAL DISMISSED RESULT: BY THE COURT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase