Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-22
Type Divorce With Minor Children
Docket 104 entries
Photo of Hon. Worthington, Susan C.

Judge

Hon. Worthington, Susan C.

Logan County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  77. RECEIPT # 2024-716626 ON 03/22/2024. PAYOR: VAN DYCK LAW OFFICE, PLLC FOR RHODES, DAVID TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 262.14. LINE ITEMS: FD-2024-73: $183.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2024-73: $6.00 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL. FD-2024-73: $1.66 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-73: $5.00 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2024-73: $1.55 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-73: $7.00 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY. FD-2024-73: $0.45 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2024-73: $2.48 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-73: $25.00 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-73: $10.00 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND. FD-2024-73: $10.00 ON AC88 SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURT HOUSE SECURITY. FD-2024-73: $10.00 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  78. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL - THOMAS SWAFFORD FOR ANNA VAN DYCK
  79. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE - DAVID RATCLIFF FOR RESPONDENT
  80. AMENDED MOTION TO MODIFY CUSTODY, VISITATION, AND CHILD SUPPORT
  81. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  82. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  83. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  84. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  85. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  86. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  87. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  88. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  89. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  90. RECEIPT # 2024-718784 ON 04/23/2024. PAYOR: STEPHENS SWAFFORD LAW PLLC IOLTA ACCT FOR RHODES, DAVID TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 86.64. LINE ITEMS: FD-2024-73: $43.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2024-73: $0.66 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-73: $5.00 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2024-73: $1.55 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-73: $0.45 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2024-73: $0.98 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-73: $25.00 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-73: $10.00 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  91. PROOF OF SERVICE - SERVED ELIZABETH RHODES ON 4-25-2024
  92. NOTICE OF HEARING
  93. JUDGE VAUGHAN: THE PETITIONER APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY, THOMAS SWAFFORD. THE RESPONDENT NOR ATTORNEY APPEAR. THE COURT ORDERS THE PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION.
  94. AGREED ORDER FOR MEDIATION, AND REAPPEARANCE DATE - JUDGE VAUGHAN
  95. RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S AMENDED MOTION TO MODIFY CUSTODY, VISITATION AND CHILD SUPPORT
  96. JUDGE REASSIGNMENT SCRIPT - HD161966
  97. PETITIONER'S OBJECTION TO RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF INTENDED RELOCATION OF THE RESIDENCE OF THE MINOR CHILDREN AND MOTION FOR EX PARTE TEMPORARY ORDER RESTRAINING RELOCATION
  98. ORDER STAYING RELOCATION - JUDGE WORTHINGTON
  99. PROOF OF SERVICE - SERVED ELIZABETH RHODES ON 7-1-2024 / PSS
  100. JUDGE WORTHINGTON: THE PLIANTIFF APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY, LUCAS STEPHENS FOR THOMAS SWAFFORD. THE DEFENDANT NOR ATTORNEY APPEAR. BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THE COURT CONTINUES THE CASE TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 AT 9:00AM.
  101. PETITIONER'S OBJECTION TO RESPONDENT'S RELOCATION OF THE RESIDENCE OF THE MINOR CHILDREN, MOTION TO ENFORCE ORDER RESTRAINING RELOCATION OF THE MINOR CHILDREN AND MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER AWARDING PETITIONER TEMPORARY CUSTODY
  102. NOTICE OF HEARING
  103. AGREED TEMPORARY ORDER MODIFYING DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE AND JOINT CUSTODY PLAN - JUDGE WORTHINGTON
  104. JUDGE WORTHINGTON: THE PETITIONER APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, THOMAS SWAFFORD. THE RESPONDENT NOR ATTORNEY APPEAR. THE COURT IS ADVISED THE PARTIES HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT AND WILL BE SUBMITTING AN AGREED JOURNAL ENTRY. THE MATTER IS NOW STRICKEN FROM THE DOCKET.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more