Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Vermont Unified

Court

Vermont Unified

Vermont

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-12-05
Status Disposed
Type Stalking Appeal
Docket 32 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - David F. Silver, Alexander M. Dean
  2. Case Open
  3. Notice of Appeal Filed TC NOA Date: 11/28/2022
  4. Transmittal Form
  5. Appellant Self-Represented Litigant Party: Appellant Raheb, Kerry P
  6. Case Number Assignment Notice
  7. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Dean, Alexander M.; Appellate Attorney Silver, David F.
  8. Letter Sent with Rules. Sent To: Appellant Raheb, Kerry P with Rules.
  9. Transcript Order Filed by: Appellant Raheb, Kerry P
  10. Appellant's Docketing Statement Filed by: Appellant Raheb, Kerry P
  11. Notice of Attorney's Appearance Filed by: Appellate Attorney Dean, Alexander M.; Appellate Attorney Silver, David F. Representing: Appellee Geannelis, Peter R
  12. Appellee's Docketing Statement Filed by: Appellate Attorney Dean, Alexander M.; Appellee Geannelis, Peter R
  13. Note Transcript Order not fulfilled due to technical error at the court. Therefore 10/28 hearing not transcribed.
  14. File Received Exhibits received from TC.
  15. Entry Order (Judicial Officer: Cohen, William D.) Issued By: WDC Re: Transcript/ Record on Appeal
  16. Exhibit Filed by: Appellant Raheb, Kerry P
  17. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - David F. Silver, Alexander M. Dean
  18. Entry Order (Judicial Officer: Cohen, William D.) Issued By: WDC Re: Generating record for hearing in trial court.
  19. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Dean, Alexander M.; Appellate Attorney Silver, David F.
  20. Letter Sent Filings of "exhibits" rejected in OFS. Sent To: Appellant Raheb, Kerry P Filings of "exhibits" rejected in OFS.
  21. Motion to Dismiss Filed by: Appellate Attorney Dean, Alexander M.; Appellee Geannelis, Peter R
  22. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - David F. Silver, Alexander M. Dean
  23. Final Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Progress PLR/HEE/KRC/WDC/NJW Mandate: Dismissed
  24. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Dean, Alexander M.; Appellate Attorney Silver, David F.
  25. Letter Sent Sent To: Appellant Raheb, Kerry P
  26. Entry Regarding Motion - Moot PLR/HEE/KRC/WDC/NJW- Final Decision renderes motion moot.
  27. Motion Response Filed by: Appellant Raheb, Kerry P
  28. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - David F. Silver, Alexander M. Dean
  29. Entry Order Issued By: PLR/HEE/KRC/WDC/NJW Re: Court denial to reconsider appeal.
  30. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Dean, Alexander M.; Appellate Attorney Silver, David F.
  31. Letter Sent Sent To: Appellant Raheb, Kerry P
  32. Case Closed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more