Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-26
Status Judgment
Type 06 Cv Breach Of Contract/warranty Civil Unlimited
Docket 18 entries
Disposition final judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Ctci Americas, Inc., A Texas Corporation|Ctci Corporation, A Corporation Duly Organized And Existing Under The Laws Of Taiwan
Defendant Bakersfield Renewable Fuels, Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company|Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., A Delaware Corporation
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 06/12/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: T-2
  2. Served 03/05/2024 Served 03/05/2024
  3. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Ex Parte application for order on Final Judgment. Proposed Order. Proposed Final Judgment. Reason: Submitted on 3/5/2024 at 12:38 p.m. Requires a new hearing date reservation. Requires the $435.00 first appearance fee for each defendant. Bakersfield Renew Fuels LLC and Global Clean Energy Holdings Inc. Correct the location of department Traffic Courtroom 2. (3131 Arrow Street Bakersfield CA 93308 Error Received: The document contains a format that is not supported by the viewer.
  4. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Pre-Cleared Reservation Expired Comment re-reserved 3/4/24 filing due 03/5/24 before noon Plaintiff 's Ex Parte Application for Judgment; contact: Neelam Molnar 949-537-3804
  5. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt x2
  6. Comment EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF ALL PARTIES FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION (Applications)
  7. Comment STIPULATION AMONG PARTIES TO ACTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
  8. Comment as to Bakersfield Renewable Fuels, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company via mail service
  9. Comment as to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation via mail service
  10. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 03/07/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 3/6/2024 Plaintiff Ex parte Application for Order to Enter Final Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation of All Parties for Entry of Final Judgment
  11. Comment Ex Parte hearing for an order for entry of final judgment continued to 3/14/2024 8:30 a.m. T-2
  12. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 03/14/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont. from 03/07/24 To review moving pleadings and sign the orders Filed 3/6/2024 Plaintiff Ex parte Application for Order to Enter Final Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation of All Parties for Entry of Final Judgment
  13. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Comment for Entry of Final Judgment on Stipulation among Partiers
  14. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark
  15. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  16. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Judgment Entered

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more