Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-09
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 117 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lakeview Loan Servicing, Llc
Defendant Keith A. Hall|Unk. Spouse Of Keith A. Hall|Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development C/o United States Attorney General|Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development C/o United States Attorney General|State Of Ohio Department Of Taxation Collections Enforcement Section|Cuyahoga County Treasurer
Photo of Hon. William T McGinty

Judge

Hon. William T McGinty

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  2. MAGISTRATE GINA LUNSFORD ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  3. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  4. JUDGE WILLIAM T MCGINTY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  5. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  6. LEGAL RESEARCH
  7. LEGAL NEWS
  8. LEGAL AID
  9. COMPUTER FEE
  10. CLERK'S FEE
  11. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID J DEMERS
  12. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID J DEMERS
  13. LAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CANCEL FORECLOSURE SALE IS TAKEN AS A MOTION TO RETURN ORDER OF SALE WITHOUT EXECUTION IS GRANTED. THE SHERIFF IS ORDERED TO RETURN THE ORDER OF SALE WITHOUT EXECUTION. PLAINTIFF MUST TIMELY SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER ON THE SHERIFF. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. OTION FILED FOR P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 MOTION TO CANCEL FORECLOSURE SALE
  15. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 AMENDED NOTICE OF SALE
  16. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 AMENDED NOTICE OF SHERIFFS SALE
  17. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 NOTICE OF SHERIFFS SALE
  18. ECORDER'S FEE $2.00
  19. ERTIFICATE OF TITLE $500.00 PAY TO COOKE DEMERS, LLC
  20. AND APPRAISAL (OOS)
  21. OTICE OF SALE AND APPROVAL OF APPRAISERS' FEES. THE SALE IS SCHEDULED FOR 03/24/2025 AT 9:00 A.M. AT CUYAHOGA.SHERIFFSALEAUCTION.OHIO.GOV. IF NOT SOLD ON 03/24/2025 IT WILL BE RE-OFFERED ON 04/07/2025 PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT EACH APPRAISER NAMED BE COMPENSATED BY THE CLERK OF COURTS, FROM THE FUNDS ON DEPOSIT AS FOLLOWS: RUTH A LASSITER, APPRAISAL COST: $52.52 REGULAR FEE AND MILEAGE. PAUL GERALD MCLAUGHLIN, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. STANLEY R PATRISKI, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. FEES TO BE TAXED AS COSTS IN CASE NO. CV-24-995609 DATED THIS 18th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 NOTICE ISSUED NOTICE ISSUED
  22. RDER OF SALE ISSUED TO TO SHERIFF WITH APPRAISAL Parcel#(s) 374-22-014
  23. EAL AUCTION
  24. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID J DEMERS
  25. RAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE $820 PRAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE
  26. UDGMENT ENTRY(55130556) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF KEITH A. HALL 13225 BAGLEY RD. CLEVELAND, OH 44130
  27. UDGMENT ENTRY(55130555) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES R. BENNETT [email protected]
  28. UDGMENT ENTRY(55130554) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES R. BENNETT [email protected]
  29. UDGMENT ENTRY(55130553) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CHRISTINE A. RUSSO [email protected]
  30. UDGMENT ENTRY(55130552) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID J DEMERS [email protected]
  31. UDGMENT ENTRY(55130551) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID J DEMERS [email protected]
  32. UDGMENT ENTRY(55130550) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LAURA L. PETERS [email protected]
  33. UDGMENT ENTRY(55130549) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANTHONY J GIUNTA [email protected]
  34. RDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION. ORDER SEE JOURNAL NOTICE ISSUED
  35. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54918279) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF KEITH A. HALL 13225 BAGLEY RD. CLEVELAND, OH 44130
  36. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54918278) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES R. BENNETT [email protected]
  37. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54918277) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES R. BENNETT [email protected]
  38. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54918276) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CHRISTINE A. RUSSO [email protected]
  39. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54918275) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LAURA L. PETERS [email protected]
  40. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54918274) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANTHONY J GIUNTA [email protected]
  41. AGISTRATE'S DECISION WITH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FILED AND SENT TO ALL PARTIES ON SERVICE PAGE.
  42. EFAULT HEARING HELD BY MAGISTRATE. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL APPEARED. DEFENDANT(S) DID NOT APPEAR. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE MAGISTRATE WILL ISSUE A MAGISTRATE'S DECISION MAKING SPECIFIC FINDINGS AS TO THE RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES OF THE PARTIES. NOTICE ISSUED
  43. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED 7/30/24 IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  44. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC HEARING
  45. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 09/04/2024 - GRANTED
  46. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED 7/29/24 IS DENIED. THE IMAGE THAT WAS DOCKETED IS FOR A DIFFERENT CASE ENTIRELY. NOTICE ISSUED
  47. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID J. DEMERS
  48. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 07/30/2024 - DENIED
  49. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF RELIES ON AN AFFIDAVIT THAT IS NOT ATTACHED TO ITS MOTION. PLAINTIFF MAY REFILE ITS MOTION WITH ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE 7/29/24. BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION, IF ANY, MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 8/29/24. REPLIES, IF ANY, MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 9/12/24. THEREAFTER, THE COURT WILL RULE ON THE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. NOTICE ISSUED
  50. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 NOTICE OF FILING PAYMENT HISTORY
  51. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 07/26/2024 - DENIED
  52. ELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 09/24/2024 AT 02:15 PM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT DEFAULT HEARING MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  53. MC HELD. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL APPEARED. DEFENDANT KEITH A. HALL'S COUNSEL APPEARED. PLAINTIFF'S ORAL MOTION TO WITHDRAW ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED 6/26/24 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN. PLAINTIFF MUST FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON OR BEFORE 7/29/24. BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION, IF ANY, MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 8/29/24. REPLIES, IF ANY, MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 9/12/24. THEREAFTER, THE COURT WILL RULE ON THE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. NOTICE ISSUED
  54. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 NOTICE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
  55. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 NOTICE OF FILING FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  56. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID J. DEMERS
  57. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 AFFIDAVIT OF MILITARY SERVICE
  58. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 06/28/2024 - WITHDRAWN
  59. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 09/24/2024 - GRANTED
  60. NSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT(D3) and SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT(D4) ATTORNEY JAMES R. BENNETT 0071663 ANSWER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  61. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY DAVID J DEMERS 0055423 NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC HEARING
  62. ASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 06/28/2024 AT 09:00 AM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  63. NSWER FILED BY D1 KEITH A. HALL ATTORNEY CHRISTINE A. RUSSO 0042142 ANSWER OF KEITH A. HALL
  64. NSWER FILED BY D6 CUYAHOGA COUNTY TREASURER ATTORNEY ANTHONY J GIUNTA 0040353 CUYAHOGA COUNTY TREASURER
  65. NSWER FILED BY D5 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION ATTORNEY LAURA L. PETERS 0063425 THE STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
  66. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53515005 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/29/2024 SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESSED BY COC 05/08/2024.
  67. UMS COMPLAINT(53703095) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF KEITH A. HALL 13225 BAGLEY RD. CLEVELAND, OH 44130 ANSWER DATE: 05/29/2024
  68. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  69. RIT FEE
  70. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE ORDINARY MAIL
  71. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53515004 RETURNED 4/27/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF KEITH A. HALL - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  72. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53515002 RETURNED 4/27/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HALL/KEITH/A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  73. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53515007 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/15/2024 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 04/24/2024.
  74. UYAHOGA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT SERVICE FEE $96.00
  75. ON 04/18/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED HALL/KEITH/A. BY LEAVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON.
  76. UYAHOGA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT SERVICE FEE $86.00
  77. 53515003 THE WITHIN NAMED UNK. SPOUSE OF KEITH A. HALL 04/18/2024 SHERIFF DEPUTY SERV. FAILURE OF SERVICE..
  78. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53515006 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/12/2024 SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESSED BY COC 04/17/2024.
  79. LERK ISSUED VIA HAND DELIVERY RETURNED 04/11/2024 - CUYAHOGA COUNTY TREASURER - COMPLETED 04/11/2024 0.00
  80. UMS COMPLAINT(53515003) SENT BY CUYAHOGA SHERIFF SERVICE. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF KEITH A. HALL 13225 BAGLEY RD. CLEVELAND, OH 44130
  81. UMS COMPLAINT(53515001) SENT BY CUYAHOGA SHERIFF SERVICE. TO: KEITH A. HALL 13225 BAGLEY RD. CLEVELAND, OH 44130
  82. HERIFF SERVICE PACKET UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF KEITH A. HALL 13225 BAGLEY RD. CLEVELAND, OHIO 44130
  83. HERIFF SERVICE PACKET KEITH A. HALL 13225 BAGLEY RD. CLEVELAND, OHIO 44130
  84. UMS COMPLAINT(53515007) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 30 EAST BROAD STREET, 14TH FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  85. UMS COMPLAINT(53515006) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  86. UMS COMPLAINT(53515005) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 10TH AND PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NW WASHINGTON, DC 25030
  87. UMS COMPLAINT(53515004) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF KEITH A. HALL 13225 BAGLEY RD. CLEVELAND, OH 44130
  88. UMS COMPLAINT(53515002) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KEITH A. HALL 13225 BAGLEY RD. CLEVELAND, OH 44130
  89. UMS COMPLAINT(53515008) SENT BY CLERK ISSUED VIA HAND DELIVERY. TO: CUYAHOGA COUNTY TREASURER 2079 EAST 9TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44115
  90. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  91. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  92. RIT FEE
  93. RIT FEE
  94. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  95. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  96. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  97. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  98. RIT FEE
  99. RIT FEE
  100. RIT FEE
  101. RIT FEE
  102. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  103. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  104. RIT FEE
  105. RIT FEE
  106. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  107. AGISTRATE GINA LUNSFORD ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  108. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  109. UDGE WILLIAM T MCGINTY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  110. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  111. EGAL RESEARCH
  112. EGAL NEWS
  113. EGAL AID
  114. OMPUTER FEE
  115. LERK'S FEE
  116. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID J DEMERS
  117. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID J DEMERS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more