Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Summit Co

Court

Summit Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-05
Type Mandamus
Docket 44 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Fidoe, Daniel
Defendant Mason, Thomas
Photo of Hon. JENNIFER D. TOWELL

Judge

Hon. JENNIFER D. TOWELL

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE
  2. A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 12, 2024 AT 1:00 P.M. VIA ZOOM. PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR ZOOM CONFERENCE DETAILS. JDT
  3. THE PARTIES APPEARED FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE VIA ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCE. PLAINTIFF’S ORAL REQUEST TO LIFT DISCOVERY STAY IS DENIED. A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER FOR OCTOBER 31, 2024 AT 1:00 P.M. VIA ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCE. JDT
  4. MS. WHITE’S MOTION IS DENIED. JDT
  5. A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER FOR OCTOBER 3, 2024 AT 1:00 P.M. VIA ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCE. JDT
  6. RESPONDENTS' JOINT ANSWER TO RELATOR'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
  7. RESPONDENTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FILED BY LINDA M. WHITE
  8. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed SVETLANA NOVAK
  9. AS THIS MATTER INVOLVES A MANDAMUS ACTION FOR PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST, MS. NOVAK'S COMPLAINTS REGARDING THE TWINSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT ARE IRRELEVANT TO THESE PROCEEDINGS. THEREFORE, MR. NOVAK'S MOTION IS DENIED. JDT
  10. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed SVETLANA NOVAK
  11. NOTICE ISSUED - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOVAK, SVETLANA
  12. LYNDA M. WHITE'S NON PARTY MOTION TO BE ADDED TO THE CASE
  13. SVETLANA NOVAK'S MOTION TO REPRESENT EVIDENCE
  14. RESPONDENTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FILED BY SUETLANO NOVAK
  15. STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD
  16. A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER FOR SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 AT 1:00 P.M. VIA ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCE. JDT
  17. SVETLANA NOVAK'S N0N-PARTY MOTION TO BE ADDED AS A PARTY OF THE CASE.
  18. STATUS REPORT
  19. RESPONDENT MASON’S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. JDT
  20. RESPONDENTS’ COMBINED MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE IS DENIED. JDT
  21. AN IN-PERSON HEARING IS SCHEDULED FOR THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE FOR JULY 24, 2024 AT 1:00 P.M. JDT
  22. RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IS HEREBY GRANTED. DISCOVERY IS STAYED UNTIL FURTHER ORDER FROM THIS COURT. JDT
  23. RESPONDENTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO RELATOR MATTHEW PFEIFER'S MOTION TO STRIKE
  24. TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR JUNE 26, 2024 AT 1:00PM. JDT
  25. REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE
  26. REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  27. MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  28. RELATORS' OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE
  29. OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT MASON'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  30. RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  31. RESPONDENTS' COMBINED MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE REALTORS' AMENDED COMPLAINT
  32. RESPONDENT THOMAS MASON'S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATORS' AMENDED COMPLAINT
  33. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  34. OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS
  35. AMENDED COMPLAINT
  36. RESPONDENTS' COMBINED MOTION TO DISMISS, FOR DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO STRIKE
  37. MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT THOMAS MASON
  38. NOTICE OF APPEARANC OF ATTORNEY'S WALTER A. SCOTT LUCAS AND DANIEL S. BURLEY AS COUNSEL FOR THOMAS MASON AND CITY OF TWINSBURG
  39. RESPONDENTS' CERTIFICATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD
  40. Certified Mail Service - Served THOMAS MASON
  41. Certified Mail Service - Served CITY OF TWINSBURG
  42. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail MASON, THOMAS
  43. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail CITY OF TWINSBURG
  44. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more