Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-26
Type Product Liability
Docket 31 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Lindsey Edward,
Defendant Csciv Llc, nuka Enterprises Llc, stash House Distribution Llc,
Photo of Hon. Civil Docket F

Judge

Hon. Civil Docket F

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  26. ANSWER / CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
  27. GREENOUGH, KELLY M; NOTICE OF IMMINENT DISMISSAL DUE TO NO ACTIVITY AND REQUEST TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED. PURSUANT TO AN EXAMINATION OF THE FILES AND DOCKET SHEET, IT APPEARS THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO SUBSTANTIAL ACTIVITY IN THE ABOVE STYLED CASE. COURTS HAVE THE POWER TO FACILITATE AND EXPEDITE CASES, INCLUDING THE POWER TO DISPOSE OF CASES WHERE THERE HAS BEEN NO ACTIVITY OR INTEREST SHOWN IN PROSECUTING IT. E.G. KINTER V. BASKIN, 520 P.2D 679 (1974). PLAINTIFF IS HERE BY NOTIFIED TO FILE BY 2/28/25, AN APPROPRIATE MOTION OR PLEADING TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S). CLERK FILED NOTICE AND MAILED COPY TO COLIN TUCKER, ROBERT SARTIN, DILLON HOLLINGSWORTH
  28. NOTICE OF IMMINENT DISMISSAL DUE TO NO ACTIVITY AND REQUEST TO SHOW CAUSE / CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
  29. PLAINTIFF'S DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  30. PLAINTIFF'S DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  31. PLAINTIFF'S DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more