Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-08-06
Type Petition To Construe Trust;petition For Resulting Trust
Docket 68 entries
Disposition Judgment
Photo of Hon. Thomas Linda S

Judge

Hon. Thomas Linda S

Nowata County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE AND ENTER PETITION (JD)
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE(JAD)
  14. DEFENDANT'S ANSWER(JAD)
  15. CM:SIGLER-PERS REP BY ATTY S BUHLINGER-K WILLIAMS BY
  16. ATTY K VINCENT. MR BUHLINGER ADVISED THAT APPRAISER
  17. ROBERT BAILEY WITH BAILEY APPRAISAL SERVICES HAS BEEN
  18. SELECTED TO CONDUCT THE APPRAISAL FOR BOTH THE INSIDE
  19. AND OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY. PRELIMINARY APPRAISAL
  20. FIGURES SHOULD BE READY THE 1ST WEEK OF DECEMBER. COURT
  21. WILL BE ADVISED. MATTER IS CONTINUED TO 12/13/21 AT
  22. 2:00 PM FOR STATUS. (GS)
  23. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (GP)
  24. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
  25. JUDGMENT(JAD)
  26. DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO REPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY
  27. JUDGMENT(JAD)
  28. ORDER SETTING HEARING(4-11-23 @ 9AM)(JAD)
  29. CM:VACLAW-PLTF BY ATTY R TUCKER-DEFT BY ATTY K VINCENT.
  30. MATTER COMES ON FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
  31. PARTIES AGREE TO HAVE THE CRT RULE ON THE PLEADINGS.
  32. CRT DENIES THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AT THIS
  33. TIME. (KM)
  34. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
  35. JUDGMENT(JAD)
  36. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION
  37. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT(JAD)
  38. PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
  39. ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT(JAD)
  40. RECUSAL (JUDGE VACLAW) (JS)
  41. ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT(JAD)
  42. KERRI WILLIAMS' PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACTS AND
  43. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW(JAD)
  44. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE(JAD)
  45. PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO KERRI WILLIAMS' PROPOSED
  46. FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW(JAD)
  47. CM:THOMAS-PLTF BY ATTY'S BUHLINGER & TUCKER-DEFT BY
  48. ATTY NESSER-MATTER COMES ON FOR MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL.
  49. ARGUMENT HEARD BY BOTH PARTIES. CRT DENIES MOTION FOR
  50. NEW TRIAL AT THIS TIME. CRT ORDERS MEDIATION, MEDIATOR
  51. TO BE CONTACTED W/IN 30 DAYS TO SCHEDULE. PARTIES
  52. ORDERED TO APPEAR 11-9-23 @ 2:30 PM FOR MEDIATION
  53. STATUS. (TB)
  54. CM:THOMAS-PLTF BY ATTY R TUCKER-DEFT APPEARS NOT.
  55. MATTER COMES ON FOR MEDIATION STATUS. ATTY TUCKER
  56. ANNOUNCES AGREED UPON EARLY SETTLEMENT MEDIATION.
  57. MATTER IS TO BE RESET UPON APPLICATION. (TB)
  58. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL(JAD)
  59. REQUEST TO SET CASE FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
  60. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
  61. CM:THOMAS-MATTER STRICKEN. PARTIES HAVE SUBMITTED AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER. RESET UPON APPLICATION. (TB)
  62. AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER
  63. REQUEST TO SET PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
  64. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
  65. CM:THOMAS-BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, MATTER IS CONTINUED TO 12-5-24 @ 2:30 PM. (TB)
  66. ORDER CONTNINUING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
  67. DISMISAL BY PLAINTIFFS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more