Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Minnesota Supreme Court

Court

Minnesota Supreme Court

Minnesota

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-03
Status Closed
Type Standard Criminal Pre Trial
Docket 27 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Notice - Case Filing
  2. Statement - Case - Appellant
  3. otice - No Response to PFR
  4. ffidavit - Service of Petition for Further Review
  5. etition - Further Review
  6. pinion - Nonprecedential
  7. otice - Opinion Release Imminent
  8. vent - Oral - Panel
  9. vent - Panel Assignment Update
  10. vent - Panel Assignment Update (one notice sent for both subs)
  11. otice - Oral Argument Date Scheduled
  12. vent - Oral Panel - scheduled for 07/18/2024, 11:15 a.m., #100
  13. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Robert Paule o/b/o Respondent
  14. ejected notice of attorney scheduling conflicts - wrong filing type chosen.
  15. rder - Grant-Respondent's Motion to Accept Late Brief is Granted and Ordered Filed. Respondent's Motoin to Reinstate Oral Arguement is Granted
  16. rief - Reply E-Filed
  17. rief - Respondent E-Filed (Ordered Filed 5/7/24)
  18. otion - Accept Late Filings - Respondent's Brief
  19. rder - Rule 142.03
  20. vent - Electronic Record Submitted/Received +C-Track/A1
  21. otice - Request Trial Court/Agency File
  22. rief - Appellant E-Filed
  23. ejected Appellant Brief-Addendum Exceeded Page Requirement Length
  24. ppellant Brief Rejected- Missing Addendum
  25. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts Atty Wothe o/b/o Appellant
  26. otice - Case Filing
  27. tatement - Case - Appellant

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more