Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-02
Type Cc Reg Foreign Jgmt (excl Dr)
Docket 42 entries
Disposition other final disposition

Parties

Plaintiff Chripczuk, Daniel S|Floodman, William L
Defendant Chripczuk, Nicole S
Photo of Hon. Fagras Michael James

Judge

Hon. Fagras Michael James

Macon County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. et Filed in Circuit Ct Exemplified Copy of Judgment. On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK Associated Entries: 04/02/2024 - Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed +
  2. ertificate of Service Rule 90.03 Memo. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  3. arnishment Returned Served Document ID - 25-GARN-2148; Served To - TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC; Served Date - 06/24/2025; Served Time - 08:00:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -DESIGNEE SERVED BY COLE COUNTY SD
  4. arnishment Paid to Attorney 25-GARN-2148
  5. xecution/Garnishment Issued This is Garnishment 25-GARN-2148 for CHRIPCZUK, NICOLE S (S30140); returnable date: CONTINUOUS ; Garnishee: TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC
  6. nterrogatories Filed Interrogatories. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  7. equest for Execution/Garnish Garnishment. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  8. ubpoena Requested Subpoena. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN
  9. arnishment Returned Served Document ID - 24-GARN-1925; Served To - CT CORPORATION SYSTEM; Served Date - 05/21/2024; Served Time - 08:10:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -S WITH CT CORP SERVED BY ST LOUIS COUNTY SD
  10. ertificate of Service Certificate of Service. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  11. otice of Service 24-GARN-1925; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  12. ertificate of Service Certificate of Service. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  13. arnishment Paid to Attorney 24-GARN-1925
  14. xecution/Garnishment Issued This is garnishment 24-GARN-1925 for NICOLE S CHRIPCZUK; UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.; returnable date: CONTINUOUS; Garnishee: CT CORPORATION SYSTEM
  15. nterrogatories Filed interrogatories. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  16. equest for Execution/Garnish garnshment. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  17. xecution/Garnishment Issued This is garnishment 24-GARN-1475 for NICOLE S CHRIPCZUK; returnable date: CONTINUOUS; Garnishee: DEAN HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
  18. nsrs to Interrogatories Filed Garnishment/Execution Number 24-GARN-1475
  19. equest for Execution/Garnish garnishment. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  20. ertificate of Service Certificate of Service. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  21. arnishment Returned Served Document ID - 24-GARN-1475; Served To - NICOLE S CHRIPCZUK; Served Date - 04/11/2024; Served Time - 08:00:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -B. L. OF CT CORP SERVED BY ST LOUIS COUNTY SD
  22. otice of Service 24-GARN-1475; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  23. ertificate of Mailing COPY OF NOTICE OF FILING OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT AND AUTHENTICATED COPY OF ORIGINAL JUDGMENT SENT TO ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA COURTHOUSE. KT
  24. arnishment Paid to Attorney 24-GARN-1475
  25. xecution/Garnishment Issued This is garnishment 24-GARN-1475 for NICOLE S CHRIPCZUK; returnable date: CONTINUOUS; Garnishee: DEAN HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
  26. nterrogatories Filed interrogatories. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  27. equest for Execution/Garnish garnishment. Filed By: WILLIAM L FLOODMAN On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  28. ertificate of Service Certificate of Service. On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  29. gmt Transcribed Circuit Court REGISTRATION OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT FROM ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF(S) AND AGAINST DEFENDANT(S) IN THE AMOUNT OF $5479.00 PLUS COURT COSTS. KT
  30. otice of Registration NOTICE OF FILING FOREIGN JUDGMENT SENT TO DEFENDANT AT ADDRESS PROVIDED. COPY SENT TO ATTORNEY BY E-FILING. MLM
  31. ther Final Disposition
  32. iling Info Sheet eFiling
  33. ote to Clerk eFiling
  34. onfid Filing Info Sheet Filed filing sheet in associated to Circuit Court filed on 04/02/2024. On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK Associated Entries: 04/02/2024 - Pet Filed in Circuit Ct +
  35. ffidavit Filed Affidavit. On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  36. ertificate of Service Certificate of Service. On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  37. otice Clerks notice to judgment debtor. On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK
  38. emorandum Filed Memo to clerk. On Behalf Of: DANIEL S CHRIPCZUK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase