Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-15
Type Mandamus
Docket 87 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rds Enterprises Inc, winding Creek Limited Partnership,
Defendant The City Of Piedmont,
Photo of Hon. Hesse Paul

Judge

Hon. Hesse Paul

Canadian County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  54. NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION FILED
  55. AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION FILED
  56. AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION FILED
  57. SECOND AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION ILFED
  58. SECOND AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION FILED
  59. SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER FILED
  60. THIRD AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION FILED
  61. SECOND AMENDED NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION FILED
  62. DEFENDANT'S FINAL WITNESS & EXHIBIT LISTS FILED
  63. SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED
  64. SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED
  65. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION FILED
  66. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION FILED
  67. SCHEDULING ORDER FILED
  68. THE CITY OF PIEDMONT'S MOTION TO COMPEL FILED
  69. JURY IMPANELMENT FEE
  70. CRT MIN. PARTIES TO SUBMIT AN AGREED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER BY THE END OF THE WEEK. FURTHER PRETRIAL CONFERENCE MAY BE CONDUCTED NEXT WEEK BY TELEPHONE. JUDGE HESSE
  71. RECEIPT # 2024-790512 ON 10/14/2024. PAYOR: STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 349.00. LINE ITEMS: CJ-2022-384: $349.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES.
  72. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER FILED
  73. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  74. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  75. THE CITY OF PIEDMONT'S MOTION IN LIMINE FILED
  76. OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL
  77. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL FILED
  78. OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE
  79. DEFENDANT CITY OF PIEDMONT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT FILED
  80. RECEIPT # 2024-797071 ON 12/23/2024. PAYOR: LYTLE SOULE & FELTY TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 50.00. LINE ITEMS: CJ-2022-384: $50.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES.
  81. ORDER SETTING HEARING FILED
  82. PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  83. THE CITY OF PIEDMONT'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED
  84. PLAINTIFFS WINDING CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND RDS ENTERPRISES INC'S COUNTER-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT FILED
  85. CRT MIN. HEARING ON THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STRICKEN BY AGREEMENT. COURT WILL ISSUE A RULING BASED ON THE FILINGS. JUDGE PAUL HESSE.
  86. ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE FROM DEFENDANT FILED
  87. THE CITY OF PIEDMONT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' COUNTER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more