Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Sussex County

Court

Sussex County

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-16
Status CLOSED - CLOSED
Type Ja Chancery Court Judgment
Docket 9 entries
Disposition judgment: satisfied

Parties

Plaintiff Tack, Robert
Defendant Mary Meade Lipetz Revocable Trust Dated December 6, 2007|Lipetz, Mary M.|Mary Meade Lipetz Revocable Trust
Photo of Hon. *JUDGMENT, JUDGE SUSSEX

Judge

Hon. *JUDGMENT, JUDGE SUSSEX

Sussex County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGMENT: SATISFIED
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT (POA)
  4. INITIAL COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: FEBRUARY 16, 2022 TRANSFER OF JUDGMENT FROM THE COURT OF CHANCERY. JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,707.00 (DEAN A. CAMPBELL ) LETTER TO THE COURT IN REGARDS TO THE TRANSFER OF JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER FROM THE COURT OF CHANCERY TO SUPERIOR COURT. ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 67317928
  5. SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT (POA)
  6. SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT (POA) POWER OF ATTORNEY FROM DEAN A. CAMPBELL TO THE PROTHONOTARY TO SATISFY JUDGMENT FILED NOVEMBER 12, 2024 DATE MANUALLY DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 15, 2024 - MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74988168
  7. JUDGMENT: SATISFIED
  8. JUDGMENT: SATISFIED DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 19, 2024 THIS JUDGMENT DEBT INTEREST AND COSTS FULLY PAID AND SATISFIED THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 SO SAITH BY POWER OF ATTORNEY DEAN A. CAMPBELL, ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF. ATTEST: MYRTLE A. THOMAS, PROTHONOTARY - MMT ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 75023875

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more