Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-01
Status Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Type Original Proceeding Civil Mandamus
Docket 26 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Filing fee paid. E-Payment $250.00 from C Thomas Ludden. (SC)
  2. Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  3. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ (SC).
  4. Filed Order Directing Answer. Having reviewed the petition and supporting documents, we conclude that an answer may assist this court in resolving the petition. Therefore, real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 21 days from the date of this order within which to file and serve an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. Petitioners shall have 14 days from service of the answer to file and serve any reply. (SC)
  5. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Real party in interest's answer to petition for writ due: April 5, 2024. (SC)
  6. Filed Real Party in Interest LiveLife, LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to File Its Answering Brief (Second Request) (SC)
  7. Filed Petitioner's Response to Motion for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief(SC)
  8. Filed Order Granting Motion. Real party in interest shall have until May 6, 2024, to file and serve an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. (SC)
  9. Filed Real Party in Interest Livelife, LLC's Answer to Petitioners' Writ of Mandamus(REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED ON 05-07-2024)(Untimely and does not comply with page volume limits)(SC)
  10. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document((Untimely and does not comply with page volume limits)(SC)
  11. Filed Real Party in Interest LiveLife, LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to File Its Answer to Petitioners' Writ of Mandamus (Third Request) and Motion to Exceed Type Volume Limitation Set by NRAP 21(d)(SC)
  12. Filed Petitioner's Response to Motion for Third Extension of Time to File Answering Brief and to Exceed Type Volume Limitations Set by NRAP 21(d)(SC)
  13. Filed Real Party in Interest Livelife, LLC's Reply in Support of It's Motion For Extension of Time to File It's Answer to Petitioners' Writ of Mandamus (Third Request) and Motion to Exceed Type Volume Limitation Set by NRAP 21(d)(SC)
  14. Filed Order Denying Motion. Real party in interest has filed an untimely motion for an extension of time to file its answer and for leave to file an answer that exceeds the type-volume limitation of NRAP 21(d). The motion to exceed the type-volume limitation does not comply with NRAP 32(a)(7)(D)(iii) because it is not accompanied by a copy of the proposed brief. Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice. Real party in interest shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve either (1) a renewed motion for leave to file an answer in excess of the type-volume limitation that fully complies with NRAP 32(a)(7)(D) or (2) an answer that complies with the page or type-volume limitation of NRAP 21(d). Given this order, the request for an extension of time is denied as moot. (SC)
  15. Filed Real Party in Interest Livelife's Renewed Motion to Exceed Type Volume Limitation Set By NRAP 21(d) For Its Answer to Petitioners' Writ of Mandamus. (DETACHED ANSWER TO PETITION AND FILED SEPARATELY PER ORDER ON 6/7/24) (SC)
  16. Filed Petitioners' Response to Renewed Motion to Exceed Type Volume Limitation Set by NRAP 21(d) for its Answer to Petitioners'' Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  17. Issued Notice to Provide Proof of Service. Due date: 7 days. (SC)
  18. Filed Certificate of Service for Petitioners' Response to Renewed Motion to Exceed Type Volume Limitation Set by NRAP 21(d) for its Answer to Petitioners'' Writ of Mandamus (SC)
  19. Filed Reply in Support of Livelife's Renewed Motion to Exceed Type Volume Limitation Set by NRAP 21(d) For Its Answer to Petitioners' Writ of Mandamus(SC)
  20. Filed Order Granting Motion. Real party in interest has filed a renewed motion to file an answer against issuance of the requested writ that exceeds the type-volume limitation. Petitioners have filed a response, and real party in interest has filed a reply. Cause appearing, the motion is granted. The clerk shall detach the answer, attached as Exhibit A to the renewed motion filed on May 21, 2024, and file it separately. Petitioners shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve any reply. (SC)
  21. Filed Real Party in Interest LiveLife, LLC's Answer to Petition for Writ. (SC)
  22. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Petitioners reply due: July 5, 2024. (SC)
  23. Filed Petitioner's Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (SC)
  24. Filed Order/Submit on Briefs. Cause appearing, oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision before a panel of this court as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. (SC)
  25. Filed Order Denying Petition. "ORDER the petition DENIED." B24-LS/KP/RP (SC)
  26. Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur.(SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more