Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-23
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 86 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lakeview Loan Servicing, Llc
Defendant Margaret Vandervort|John Doe, Name Unknown, The Unknown Spouse Of Margaret Vandervort (if Any)|United States Of America The Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development
Photo of Hon. William T McGinty

Judge

Hon. William T McGinty

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(54992018) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: PETER L MEHLER [email protected]
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(54992017) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(54992016) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(54992015) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(54992014) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  7. UDGMENT ENTRY(54992013) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES R. BENNETT [email protected]
  8. UDGMENT ENTRY(54992012) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES R. BENNETT [email protected]
  9. LAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE MOOT. THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 10/22/2024 AT 08:45 AM IS CANCELLED. FINAL. . . COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. ELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/22/2024 AT 08:45 AM IS CANCELLED.
  11. OTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER RULE 41(A)(2) 10/07/2024 - GRANTED
  12. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53153871 RETURNED 04/03/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT VANDERVORT/MARGARET / - RETURN TO SENDER NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  13. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53208101 RETURNED 04/05/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MARGARET VANDERVORT - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  14. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY ANN M JOHNSON 0072981 NOTICE OF HEARING
  15. ELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 10/22/2024 AT 08:45 AM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT DEFAULT HEARING MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING OF FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  17. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 AFFIDAVIT REGARDING MILITARY STATUS
  18. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING ENTRY ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
  19. OTICE FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
  20. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 10/07/2024 - DENIED AS MOOT
  21. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10/07/2024 - DENIED AS MOOT
  22. MC HELD. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL APPEARED. DEFENDANT MARGARET VANDERVORT'S COUNSEL APPEARED. NO OTHER PARTIES APPEARED. ALL DISCOVERY MUST BE COMPLETED BY 7/19/24. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, IF ANY, MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 8/19/24, BUT NOT BEFORE 8/12/24. BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION, IF ANY, MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 9/19/24. REPLIES, IF ANY, MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 10/3/24. THEREAFTER, THE COURT WILL RULE ON THE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. NOTICE ISSUED
  23. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 CIVIL RULE 26(B)(3) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  24. ASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 06/05/2024 AT 09:15 AM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  25. NSWER FILED BY D1 MARGARET VANDERVORT ATTORNEY PETER L MEHLER 0075283 ANSWER OF MARGARET VANDERVORT
  26. NSWER FILED BY D3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATTORNEY JAMES R. BENNETT 0071663 ANSWER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  27. TIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD
  28. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 AFFIDAVIT OF JUSTIN M. RITCH
  29. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53208101 RETURNED 4/5/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MARGARET VANDERVORT - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  30. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53208100 RETURNED 4/5/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT VANDERVORT/MARGARET / - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  31. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53153871 RETURNED 4/3/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT VANDERVORT/MARGARET / - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  32. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53153872 RETURNED 4/3/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MARGARET VANDERVORT - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  33. ON 03/21/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  34. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED SERVICE RETURN
  35. UMS COMPLAINT(53350600) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  36. RIT FEE
  37. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  38. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53208102 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/12/2024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROCESSED BY COC 03/20/2024.
  39. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53153873 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/05/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROCESSED BY COC 03/20/2024.
  40. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  41. ON 02/27/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED VANDERVORT/MARGARET / BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  42. ON 02/27/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED JOHN DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MARGARET VANDERVORT BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  43. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53153874 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/06/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROCESSED BY COC 03/13/2024.
  44. UMS COMPLAINT(53208102) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  45. UMS COMPLAINT(53208101) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MARGARET VANDERVORT 2452 SAYBROOK ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  46. UMS COMPLAINT(53208100) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARGARET VANDERVORT 2452 SAYBROOK ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  47. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  48. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  49. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  50. RIT FEE
  51. RIT FEE
  52. RIT FEE
  53. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED RETURN OF SERVICE
  54. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED RETURN OF SERVICE
  55. UMS COMPLAINT(53153874) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20530-0000
  56. UMS COMPLAINT(53153873) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O US ATTY FOR THE N DIST. OF OH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113-0000
  57. UMS COMPLAINT(53153872) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MARGARET VANDERVORT 2452 SAYBROOK ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  58. UMS COMPLAINT(53153871) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARGARET VANDERVORT 2452 SAYBROOK ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  59. UMS COMPLAINT(53154287) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JOHN DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MARGARET VANDERVORT 2452 SAYBROOK ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  60. UMS COMPLAINT(53154286) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: MARGARET VANDERVORT 2452 SAYBROOK ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  61. RIT FEE
  62. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  63. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  64. RIT FEE
  65. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  66. RIT FEE
  67. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  68. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  69. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  70. RIT FEE
  71. RIT FEE
  72. RIT FEE
  73. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  74. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  75. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  76. AGISTRATE GINA LUNSFORD ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  77. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  78. UDGE WILLIAM T MCGINTY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  79. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  80. EGAL RESEARCH
  81. EGAL NEWS
  82. EGAL AID
  83. OMPUTER FEE
  84. LERK'S FEE
  85. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  86. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more