Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-20
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 35 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant Rayshawn A. Jefferson Wilson
Photo of Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Judge

Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55189579) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RAYSHAWN A. JEFFERSON WILSON 9404 N. CHURCH DRIVE, APT. 213 PARMA, OH 44130
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55189578) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55189577) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  5. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET INDICATES THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOST RECENT ATTEMPT AT SERVICE HAS FAILED. ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO THIS COURT'S 8/20/24 ORDER, THE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT WILSON ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT CIV.R. 41(B)(1). COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 07/29/2024, IS DENIED. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54869321 RETURNED 09/30/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JEFFERSON WILSON/RAYSHAWN/A. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  8. SUMS COMPLAINT(54869321) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RAYSHAWN A. JEFFERSON WILSON 17807 FAIRVILLE AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44135-0000
  9. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  10. WRIT FEE
  11. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE BY CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE
  12. CASE CALLED FOR CMC ON 8/20/24. UPON REVIEW OF THE DOCKET WITH COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, IT APPEARS THAT THE REGULAR MAIL SERVICE HAS BEEN RETURNED UNSUCCESSFULLY, THEREFORE SERVICE HAS NOT BEEN PERFECTED ON DEFENDANT WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). "IF A SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT IS NOT MADE UPON A DEFENDANT WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT AND THE PARTY ON WHOSE BEHALF SUCH SERVICE WAS REQUIRED CANNOT SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SUCH SERVICE WAS NOT MADE WITHIN THAT PERIOD. THE ACTION SHALL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE UPON THE COURT'S OWN INITIATIVE WITH NOTICE TO SUCH PARTY OR UPON MOTION." THIS CASE WAS FILED ON 2/20/24. IF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HAS NOT BEEN PERFECTED BY 9/28/24, THIS CASE WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. REGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 53765184 RETURNED 07/31/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JEFFERSON WILSON/RAYSHAWN/A. ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  14. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  15. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 10/29/2024 - DENIED
  16. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT DEFENDANT WAS SERVED VIA REGULAR MAIL ON 5/9/24. DEFENDANT WAS REQUIRED TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 6/5/24. AS OF 7/26/24, NO ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED. PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT FORTHWITH. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 41(B)(1). THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  17. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR JEFFERSON WILSON/RAYSHAWN/A. 07/24/2024 17:02:01
  18. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR BUNDY/RYAN/S. 07/24/2024 17:02:01
  19. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 08/20/2024 AT 11:30 AM. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES SHALL APPEAR BY PHONE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE APPEAR BY PHONE. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL CALL THE CONFERENCE NUMBER (978) 990-5135 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 4088405# AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, DISCOVERY PROGRESS, AND SCHEDULING MATTERS.
  20. SUMS COMPLAINT(53765184) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RAYSHAWN A. JEFFERSON WILSON 9404 N. CHURCH DRIVE, APT. 213 PARMA, OH 44130 ANSWER DATE: 06/05/2024
  21. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. WRIT FEE
  23. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE BY ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE
  24. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53143538 RETURNED 3/28/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JEFFERSON WILSON/RAYSHAWN/A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  25. SUMS COMPLAINT(53143538) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RAYSHAWN A. JEFFERSON WILSON 9404 N. CHURCH DRIVE, APT. 213 PARMA, OH 44130
  26. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. WRIT FEE
  28. JUDGE DANIEL GAUL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  29. LEGAL RESEARCH
  30. LEGAL NEWS
  31. LEGAL AID
  32. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  33. COMPUTER FEE
  34. CLERK'S FEE
  35. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID RYAN S. BUNDY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more