Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Sussex County

Court

Sussex County

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-13
Status STAYED - STAYED
Type Ci Ejectment
Docket 71 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Bogert, Cheryl I.
Defendant Rhoads, Bridget A.
Photo of Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Judge

Hon. Karsnitz Craig A

Sussex County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING EJECTMENT
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. ORDER
  4. WRIT ISSUED
  5. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  6. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  7. LETTER
  8. LETTER
  9. LETTER
  10. ORDER
  11. EVENT CONTINUED / RESCHEDULED
  12. MOTION TO DISMISS
  13. RE-NOTICE
  14. MOTION DENIED
  15. MOTION PASSED
  16. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  17. RE-NOTICE
  18. ANSWER & COUNTERCLAIM
  19. MOTION
  20. CIVIL MOTION HEARING HELD
  21. ORDER
  22. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  23. LETTER
  24. LETTER
  25. ORDER
  26. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  27. MOTION DENIED
  28. CIVIL HEARING HELD ON 6/7/2024 - GGM JUDGE CRAIG A. KARSNITZ PRESIDING MOTION DENIED DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 7, 2024
  29. MOTION PASSED
  30. CIVIL HEARING HELD ON 6/7/2024 - GGM JUDGE CRAIG A. KARSNITZ PRESIDING MOTION FOR EJECTMENT - PASSED/RE-NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 7, 2024
  31. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  32. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 8, 2024 JUDICIAL ACTION FORM FROM CIVIL MOTION HEARD ON 6-7-2024. ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73339817
  33. RE-NOTICE
  34. RE-NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 11, 2024 RULE TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING ON COMPLAINT FOR EJECTMENT TO BE HEARD ON FRIDAY, JUNE 21, 2024 AT 11:00 A.M. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73352967
  35. ANSWER & COUNTERCLAIM
  36. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 18, 2024 ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM (DEAN A. CAMPBELL) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73409435
  37. MOTION
  38. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 18, 2024 MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION (DEAN A. CAMPBELL) NOTICE OF MOTION WILL BE HEARD AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE COURT EXHIBIT A PROPOSED ORDER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73409503
  39. CIVIL MOTION HEARING HELD
  40. CIVIL HEARING HELD ON 6/21/2024- GGM JUDGE CRAIG A. KARSNITZ PRESIDING - COUNSEL AGREED TO STAY THE CASE UNTIL WHATEVER HAPPENS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA CASE. - NOTIFY THE COURT OF THE STATUS IN 3 MONTHS. DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 21, 2024
  41. ORDER
  42. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 22, 2024 ORDER SIGNED BY JUDGE CRAIG A. KARSNITZ ON 6-21-2024. IT HEREBY GRANTS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY THIS MATTER PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ACTION. DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL SHALL NOTIFY THIS COURT OF THE STATUS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ACTIN 3 MONTHS FORM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73454979
  43. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  44. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 22, 2024 JUDICIAL ACTION FORM FROM CIVIL MOTION HEARD ON 6-21-2024. ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73454979
  45. LETTER
  46. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 3, 2024 LETTER FROM KATHALEEN ST. J. MCCORMICK TO CHIEF JUSTICE SEITZ RE: REQUEST THAT THE HONORABLE CRAIG A. KARSNITZ BE DESIGNATED TO SIT AS A VICE CHANCELLOR OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY. ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73536869
  47. LETTER
  48. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 3, 2024 LETTER FROM LISA M. STEELE TO COUNSEL RE: OFFICE CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR JULY 25, 2024 AT 11:00 .M. ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73536869
  49. ORDER
  50. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 3, 2024 ORDER SIGNED BY CHIEF JUSTICE COLLINS J. SEITZ, JR ON 7-1-2024. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, THAT THE HONORABLE CRAIG A. KARSNITZ IS DESIGNATED WITH THE CONSENT OF CHANCELLOR KATHALEEN ST. J. MCCORMICK TO SIT AS A VICE CHANCELLOR ON THE COURTS OF CHANCERY FOR THE PURPOSE OF HEARING AND DECIDING ALL ISSUES IN BRIDGET RHOADS, ET AL V. BOGERT, ET AL. C.A. NO.2024-0671 ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73536869
  51. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  52. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: JULY 26, 2024 JUDICIAL ACTION FORM FROM OFFICE CONFERENCE ON 7-25-2024. ACCEPTED BY: GGM TRANSACTION ID: 73797441
  53. OFFICE CONFERENCE HELD
  54. OFFICE CONFERENCE HELD ON 7/25/2024 - GGM JUDGE CRAIG A. KARSNITZ PRESIDING - COUNSEL SHOULD SUBMIT AN ORDER STAYING THE CHANCERY COURT CASE AS WELL. DATE DOCKETED: JULY 25, 2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more