Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-27
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 115 entries

Parties

Plaintiff The Huntington National Bank
Defendant Kayla A Weschke|John Doe, Real Name Unknown, The Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Kayla A Weschke Aka Kayla Cintron|Jaime L. Cintron|Jane Doe, Real Name Unknown, The Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Jaime L Cintron|United State Of America C/o U.s. District Attorney Civil Process Clerk|United States Of America C/o U.s. Attorney General Department Of Justice|Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development
Photo of Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Judge

Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  2. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  3. LEGAL RESEARCH
  4. LEGAL NEWS
  5. LEGAL AID
  6. COMPUTER FEE
  7. CLERK'S FEE
  8. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID WILLIAM L. COSTELLO
  9. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID WILLIAM L. COSTELLO
  10. ERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 53425067 ADDRESSED TO JAIME L. CINTRON(D3) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  11. ERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 53425064 ADDRESSED TO JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE,(D2) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  12. ERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 53425061 ADDRESSED TO KAYLA A WESCHKE(D1) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  13. NSWER FILED BY D5 UNITED STATE OF AMERICA ATTORNEY KIMBERLY L. LUBRANI 0088031 ANSWER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  14. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 53660945 RETURNED 05/30/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  15. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53425065 RETURNED 04/05/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  16. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53425062 RETURNED 04/05/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WESCHKE/KAYLA/A - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  17. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53659184 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/29/2024 JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, PROCESSED BY COC 05/08/2024.
  18. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53659183 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/29/2024 CINTRON/JAIME/L. PROCESSED BY COC 05/08/2024.
  19. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53659182 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/29/2024 JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, PROCESSED BY COC 05/08/2024.
  20. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53659181 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/29/2024 WESCHKE/KAYLA/A PROCESSED BY COC 05/08/2024.
  21. UMS COMPLAINT(53660945) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 10813 LINNET AVE. CLEVELAND, OH 44111-0000 ANSWER DATE: 05/23/2024
  22. UMS COMPLAINT(53659184) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 6103 SUNDERLAND DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  23. UMS COMPLAINT(53659183) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAIME L. CINTRON 6103 SUNDERLAND DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  24. UMS COMPLAINT(53659182) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 6103 SUNDERLAND DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  25. UMS COMPLAINT(53659181) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KAYLA A WESCHKE 6103 SUNDERLAND DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  26. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. RIT FEE
  28. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  29. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  30. RIT FEE
  31. RIT FEE
  32. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  33. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. RIT FEE
  35. RIT FEE
  36. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR ORDINARY MAIL
  37. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
  38. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53425072 RETURNED 4/24/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  39. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53425076 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/15/2024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROCESSED BY COC 04/24/2024.
  40. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53425077 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/11/2024 SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESSED BY COC 04/17/2024.
  41. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53425075 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/08/2024 UNITED STATE OF AMERICA PROCESSED BY COC 04/17/2024.
  42. ON 04/02/2024 THE WITHIN NAMED WESCHKE/KAYLA/A WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  43. ON 04/02/2024 THE WITHIN NAMED JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  44. ON 04/05/2024 THE WITHIN NAMED CINTRON/JAIME/L. WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  45. ON 04/05/2024 THE WITHIN NAMED JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  46. AGISTRATE DEAN K HEGYES ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  47. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  48. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  49. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  50. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  51. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  52. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53425069 RETURNED 4/6/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT CINTRON/JAIME/L. - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  53. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53425073 RETURNED 4/5/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  54. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53425065 RETURNED 4/5/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  55. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53425062 RETURNED 4/5/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WESCHKE/KAYLA/A - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  56. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  57. UMS COMPLAINT(53425077) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 451 SEVENTH STREET SW WASHINGTON, DC 20410
  58. UMS COMPLAINT(53425076) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, DC 20530
  59. UMS COMPLAINT(53425075) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATE OF AMERICA 400 UNITED STATES COURT HOUSE 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  60. UMS COMPLAINT(53425073) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 5800 LAURENT DRIVE, APT. 719 CLEVELAND, OH 44129-0000
  61. UMS COMPLAINT(53425072) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 10813 LINNET AVE. CLEVELAND, OH 44111-0000
  62. UMS COMPLAINT(53425071) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 6103 SUNDERLAND DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  63. UMS COMPLAINT(53425069) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAIME L. CINTRON 5800 LAURENT DRIVE, APT. 719 CLEVELAND, OH 44129-0000
  64. UMS COMPLAINT(53425068) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAIME L. CINTRON 10813 LINNET AVE. CLEVELAND, OH 44111-0000
  65. UMS COMPLAINT(53425067) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAIME L. CINTRON 6103 SUNDERLAND DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  66. UMS COMPLAINT(53425065) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 10355 S. LAKE BLVD., APT. L-22 CLEVELAND, OH 44130-0000
  67. UMS COMPLAINT(53425064) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 6103 SUNDERLAND DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  68. UMS COMPLAINT(53425062) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KAYLA A WESCHKE 10355 S. LAKE BLVD., APT. L-22 CLEVELAND, OH 44130-0000
  69. UMS COMPLAINT(53425061) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KAYLA A WESCHKE 6103 SUNDERLAND DRIVE PARMA, OH 44129
  70. UMS COMPLAINT(53425074) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JANE DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 10813 LINNET AVE. CLEVELAND, OH 44111-0000
  71. UMS COMPLAINT(53425070) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JAIME L. CINTRON 10813 LINNET AVE. CLEVELAND, OH 44111-0000
  72. UMS COMPLAINT(53425066) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JOHN DOE, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE, 10355 S. LAKE BLVD., APT. L-22 CLEVELAND, OH 44130-0000
  73. UMS COMPLAINT(53425063) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: KAYLA A WESCHKE 10355 S. LAKE BLVD., APT. L-22 CLEVELAND, OH 44130-0000
  74. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  75. RIT FEE
  76. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  77. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  78. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  79. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  80. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  81. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  82. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  83. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  84. RIT FEE
  85. RIT FEE
  86. RIT FEE
  87. RIT FEE
  88. RIT FEE
  89. RIT FEE
  90. RIT FEE
  91. RIT FEE
  92. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  93. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  94. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  95. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  96. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  97. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  98. RIT FEE
  99. RIT FEE
  100. RIT FEE
  101. RIT FEE
  102. RIT FEE
  103. RIT FEE
  104. RIT FEE
  105. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  106. RIT FEE
  107. UDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  108. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  109. EGAL RESEARCH
  110. EGAL NEWS
  111. EGAL AID
  112. OMPUTER FEE
  113. LERK'S FEE
  114. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID WILLIAM L. COSTELLO
  115. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID WILLIAM L. COSTELLO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more