Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-14
Status Judgment
Type 47 Small Claims $5,001 $10,000
Docket 67 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Ryan, Nathan Andrew|View Document 3/14/24 Sc 100 's Claim Hrng: 5/23/24|View Document 3/14/24 Sc 100 's Claim Hrng: 5/23/24
Defendant Sekhon, Robin S
Photo of Hon. Tharpe, D. Tyler

Judge

Hon. Tharpe, D. Tyler

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. View Document FW-003-Fee Waiver Order
  2. Comment By Deputy Clerk
  3. Cause Of Action
  4. Action Plaintiff's Claim
  5. File Date
  6. Notice of Hearing
  7. View Document Notice of Hearing 5/23/24
  8. Comment Hearing moved from 97E to 402
  9. Proof of Service
  10. View Document Proof of Service
  11. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  12. Served
  13. Comment Fee: $130.00
  14. Court Trial
  15. Original Type Court Trial
  16. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  17. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  18. Result Heard
  19. Plaintiff: Ryan, Nathan Andrew
  20. Defendant: Sekhon, Robin S
  21. Minute Order Attachment
  22. View Document -Minute Order Attachment
  23. Appeared in Person
  24. Taken Under Submission or Advisement
  25. Notice to Dispose Exhibits Sent
  26. View Document -Notice to Dispose Exhibits Sent
  27. Comment Recipient: Nathan Ryan
  28. Notice to Dispose Exhibits Sent
  29. View Document -Notice to Dispose Exhibits Sent
  30. Comment Recipient: Robin Sekhon
  31. Exhibit List Filed
  32. Comment For Plaintiff
  33. Exhibit List Filed
  34. Comment For Defendant
  35. Notice of Entry of Judgment Mailed to All Parties
  36. Small Claims Appeal filed
  37. Request for Trial De Novo
  38. View Document Request for Trial De Novo
  39. Comment Notice of Appeal filed in Small Claims by Robin Sekhon
  40. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  41. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Notice of Appeal) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on () . Parties served: (Nathan Ryan, Robin Sekhon) Copy of Notice of Appeal given to Robin Sekhon over the Counter on 6/20/24
  42. Notice to Dispose Exhibits Sent
  43. View Document Notice to Dispose Exhibits Sent
  44. Comment Recipient: Nathan Ryan; Robin Sekhon
  45. Chambers Work-Exhibits
  46. Original Type Chambers Work-Exhibits
  47. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  48. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  49. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  50. Order to Dispose Exhibits Signed and Filed
  51. View Document Order Received for Signature
  52. Comment Judge: T Tharpe
  53. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  54. View Document Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  55. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Order to Dispose of Exhibits Introduced or Filed in the Civil Case and Remaining in Possession of the Exhibit Clerk ) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on () . Parties served: (Nathan Andrew Ryan, Robin S Sekhon )
  56. Request Filed
  57. View Document Request Filed
  58. Comment To Pay Judgment to Court
  59. Deposit, payment,disbursment
  60. View Document Deposit, payment,disbursment
  61. Comment Money deposited into trust account in the amount of $13,947.65 by Robin Sekhon for Nathan Ryan Reason: No contact with Nathan Ryan Receipt #CIVIL-2025-00002943
  62. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  63. View Document Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  64. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Request to Pay Judgment to Court, Deposit Slip was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: Nathan Ryan

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.