Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-04
Status Dismissed
Type 06 Unlimited Breach Of Contract/warranty
Docket 146 entries
Disposition settlement

Parties

Plaintiff Powell, Phillip A.
Defendant Mercedes Benz Usa, Llc|Sanger Buick, Inc
Photo of Hon. Skiles Jon M

Judge

Hon. Skiles Jon M

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  9. Comment CMC and Judge for All Purposes (emailed)
  10. Proof of Service
  11. View Document Proof of Service Summons
  12. Proof of Service
  13. View Document Proof of Service Summons
  14. Summons and Complaint
  15. Served
  16. Summons and Complaint
  17. Unserved
  18. Comment DEFECTIVE. Proof of Service by Mail on Line 3c does not show documents addressed to person listed on Line 3b of the proof.
  19. Answer Filed
  20. View Document - Answer/Response/Denial/Demurrer - First Appearance Fee
  21. Pursuant to CCP 170.6 - Judge Disqualified
  22. View Document - Peremptory Challenge
  23. Judicial Officer Hamilton, Jr., Jeffrey Y.
  24. Comment Judge: Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Jr. Date:
  25. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  26. View Document - CV-47 Notice of Assignment of Judge For All Purposes
  27. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Notice of Assignment of Judge for All Purposes was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.
  28. Notice of Change of Address Filed
  29. View Document Notice of Change of Address
  30. Answer Filed
  31. View Document Answer
  32. Comment Defendant Sangera Buick, Inc. dba Mercedes-Benz of Bakersfield's Answer to Complaint
  33. Case Management Statement Filed
  34. View Document Case Management Statement
  35. Comment HRG:
  36. Notice Filed
  37. View Document Notice of consent to electronic service
  38. Comment Consent to electronic Service and Notice of electronic service address
  39. Case Management Statement Filed
  40. View Document Case Management Statement
  41. Comment HRG:
  42. Notice Filed
  43. View Document Notice of Jury Deposit
  44. Comment of Jury Deposit
  45. Case Management Statement Filed
  46. View Document Case Management Statement
  47. Comment HRG:
  48. ADR Stipulation Mediation filed
  49. View Document 10084Stipulat006c5c9
  50. Comment Parties to engage in mediation. Mediator: Matthew M. Proudfoot
  51. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  52. Comment Party: Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  53. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  54. View Document Order Regarding remote Appearance
  55. View Document Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  56. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  57. Comment Party: Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  58. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  59. Comment Mailed/Emailed to: [email protected]; [email protected]
  60. Case Management Conference
  61. Original Type Case Management Conference
  62. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  63. Hearing Time 3:00 PM
  64. Result Heard
  65. Appeared in Person
  66. Comment Special Appearance from M.Hubbell on behalf of the Plantiff
  67. Remote Appearance Via Courtcall
  68. Comment Special Appearance from K.Zipser and Special Appearance from C.Lee on behalf of the Defendants
  69. Referral to ADR
  70. Jury Trial Requested by Both Parties
  71. Comment Estimated time from trial is 7 days
  72. Minute Order Attachment
  73. View Document -Minute Order Attachment
  74. Request for Pre-Trial Discovery filed
  75. View Document 7.9.24 Request for Pretrial Discovery Conference
  76. Opposition to Request for Pre-Trial Discovery filed
  77. View Document Opposition to pretrial discovery conference
  78. Comment FWD: 403
  79. Chambers Work- Pre
  80. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  81. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  82. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  83. Result Heard
  84. Comment PTDC req. ~
  85. Order Denied
  86. View Document 7.26.24 Order on PTDC & CM
  87. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  88. Comment on request for Pretrial Discovery Conference and CM
  89. Declaration Filed
  90. View Document - Gallagher Decl ISO MTC Depo
  91. Comment of Mehgan Gallagher ISO Motion to Compel Deposition
  92. Notice of Motion
  93. View Document - Motion to Compel Depo
  94. Comment Compel Deposition
  95. Order Received for Signature
  96. View Document - Proposed Order Re Mtn Compel
  97. Comment [Proposed] Order Re Motion to Compel Deposition
  98. Declaration Filed
  99. View Document - Dec of M Gallagher
  100. Comment of Mehgan Gallagher ISO Motion to Compel Production of Vehicle Inspection
  101. Notice of Motion
  102. View Document - Motion to Compel Vehicle Inspection
  103. Comment Compel Production of Vehicle for Inspection
  104. Order Received for Signature
  105. View Document - Proposed Order Vehicle Inspection
  106. Comment [Proposed] Order on Motion to Compel Production of Vehicle for Inspection
  107. Conditional Settlement Reached
  108. View Document 10.7.24 Notice of Settlement of Entire Case
  109. Comment Projected Completion Date:
  110. Notice of Hearing
  111. View Document CV-31 Notice of Dismissal Hearing Pursuant to Rule 3.3185
  112. View Document CV-31 Notice of Dismissal Hearing Pursuant to Rule 3.3185
  113. View Document CV-31 Notice of Dismissal Hearing Pursuant to Rule 3.3185
  114. Motion - Compel Attendance
  115. Judicial Officer Gamoian, Lisa M.
  116. Hearing Time 3:27 PM
  117. Cancel Reason Settled
  118. Comment Depo - Megan Gallagher - Filed
  119. Motion - Compel
  120. Judicial Officer Gamoian, Lisa M.
  121. Hearing Time 3:27 PM
  122. Cancel Reason Settled
  123. Comment Vehicle Inspection - Megan Gallagher - Filed
  124. Motion - Compel Attendance
  125. Judicial Officer Gamoian, Lisa M.
  126. Hearing Time 3:27 PM
  127. Cancel Reason Settled
  128. Comment Depo of PMK - Luis A Serrano
  129. Request for Dismissal Received - Pending Review
  130. View Document Dismissal - Other filed
  131. Request for Dismissal Received - Pending Review
  132. View Document Request for Dismissal
  133. CRC 3.1385 After Settlement
  134. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G
  135. Hearing Time 3:01 PM
  136. Cancel Reason Dismissed
  137. Mandatory Settlement Conference
  138. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  139. Cancel Reason Settled
  140. Trial Readiness
  141. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  142. Hearing Time 9:30 AM
  143. Cancel Reason Settled
  144. Jury Trial
  145. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  146. Hearing Time 9:00 AM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more