Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- RECEIPT # 2024-767484 ON 02/29/2024. PAYOR: SPARKS/GARRETT W TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 249.64. LINE ITEMS: FD-2024-102: $178.45 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2024-102: $6.25 ON AC09 CARD ALLOCATIONS. FD-2024-102: $5.85 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL. FD-2024-102: $0.64 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-102: $4.87 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2024-102: $1.51 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-102: $6.82 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY. FD-2024-102: $0.43 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2024-102: $0.95 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-102: $24.37 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-102: $9.75 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND. FD-2024-102: $9.75 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
- WAIVER OF SUMMONS AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE//FILED
- CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT//FILED
- CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT//FILED
- CRT MIN. COMES ON FOR A WAIVER DIVORCE. COURT TAKES NOTICE THAT THE ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND WAIVER OF SUMMONS WAS FILED ON MARCH 22, 2024. THE COURT IS PRESENTED WITH AN AGREED DECREE, PARENTING PLAN AND CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES FINDING THE SIGNATURES OF BOTH PARTIES ON ALL THREE DOCUMENTS. AFTER REVIEW OF THE DOCUMENTS, THE COURT MAKES SEVERAL DELINEATIONS INCLUDING THAT THE PARTIES ARE NOT DEVIATING FROM THE CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES AND PROVISIONS FOR TAX DEDUCTIONS, AND CLAIMING THE MINOR CHILDREN WERE ADDED BY THE COURT AND PROVISIONS FOR UNCOVERED MEDICAL EXPENSES ADDED BY THE COURT. THE COURT FINDS THAT JURISDICTION IS PROPER, THAT THERE ARE PROVISIONS FOR THE DIVISION OF ASSETS AND DEBTS AS WELL AS CUSTODY AND VISITATION. THE COURT FINDS THAT THE DOCUMENTS ARE PROPER. THE COURT EXECUTES THE DECREE OF DIVORCE, THE JOINT CHILD CUSTODY PLAN, AND THE CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES THIS DATE GRANTING THE DIVORCE ON THE GROUNDS OF INCOMPATIBILITY. JUDGE HALLEY
- DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE//FILED
- PARENT PLAN ORDER//FILED
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In