Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-15
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 150 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Wilmington Savings Fund Society Fsb, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Owner Trustee Of Csmc 2018 Rpl 3 Trust
Defendant Matthew D. Miktuk|Unk. Spouse Of Matthew D. Miktuk|State Of Ohio, Department Of Taxation|Capital One, N.a.
Photo of Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Judge

Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGE JOHN D SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  2. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  3. LEGAL RESEARCH
  4. LEGAL NEWS
  5. LEGAL AID
  6. COMPUTER FEE
  7. CLERK'S FEE
  8. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  9. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  10. UDGMENT ENTRY(56110586) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  11. UDGMENT ENTRY(56110585) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  12. UDGMENT ENTRY(56110584) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  13. UDGMENT ENTRY(56110583) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  14. UDGMENT ENTRY(56110582) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  15. UDGMENT ENTRY(56110581) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ROBERT J BYRNE [email protected]
  16. ECREE OF CONFIRMATION (Parcel(s) #79522017) THE SHERIFF HAVING SOLD THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER OF SALE ISSUED TO HIM, THE COURT BEING SATISFIED OF THE LEGALITY OF THE SALE AND THAT THE NOTICE OF THE SALE WAS IN ALL RESPECTS IN CONFORMITY TO LAW, APPROVES AND CONFIRMS THE SAME AND DIRECTS THE SHERIFF TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER TO WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF CSMC 2018-RPL3 TRUST A GOOD AND SUFFICIENT DEED THEREOF. UPON FULL PAYMENT OF THE PURCHASE PRICE, THE PURCHASER WILL BE ENTITLED TO A WRIT OF POSSESSION AGAINST ALL PARTY DEFENDANTS. ALL UNDISPUTED STATE LIENS ARE PROTECTED AS PROVIDED IN R.C. SEC. 2329.192. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS MUST SERVE, IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B), ALL PARTIES NOT IN DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR NOTICE OF THIS JUDGMENT AND ITS DATE OF ENTRY UPON THE JOURNAL AND MUST NOTE THE SERVICE ON THE APPEARANCE DOCKET. NOTICE ISSUED
  17. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ADVANCES IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. ORDER SEE JOURNAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. OTION FILED FOR P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY RICHARD J. SYKORA 0093134 MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT
  19. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ADVANCES IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE UP TO AND INCLUDING JANUARY 30, 2025, TO FILE THEIR MOTION FOR ADVANCES. FAILURE TO FILE THE MOTION FOR ADVANCES WILL BE DEEMED A WAIVER OF ANY AND ALL ADVANCES. NOTICE ISSUED
  20. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ADVANCES
  21. OS ORDER OF SALE RETURNED 12/11/2024, SOLD DATE 12/9/2024 SOLD TO: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF CSMC 2018-RPL3 TRUST FOR $94,200.00
  22. ROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED. PUBLICATION COST OF $641.20 PREPAID TO LEGAL NEWS.
  23. ECORDER'S FEE $1.00
  24. ERTIFICATE OF TITLE $573.00 PAY TO MANLEY, DEAS & KOCHALSKI, LLC
  25. OTICE OF SALE AND APPROVAL OF APPRAISERS' FEES. THE SALE IS SCHEDULED FOR 11/04/2024 AT 9:00 A.M. AT CUYAHOGA.SHERIFFSALEAUCTION.OHIO.GOV. IF NOT SOLD ON 11/04/2024 IT WILL BE RE-OFFERED ON 11/18/2024 PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT EACH APPRAISER NAMED BE COMPENSATED BY THE CLERK OF COURTS, FROM THE FUNDS ON DEPOSIT AS FOLLOWS: CHRISTOPHER J LOFTUS, APPRAISAL COST: $52.02 REGULAR FEE AND MILEAGE. JOHN KOZ, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. STANLEY R PATRISKI, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. FEES TO BE TAXED AS COSTS IN CASE NO. CV-24-994478 DATED THIS 1st DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 NOTICE ISSUED NOTICE ISSUED
  26. OTICE FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF SALE
  27. AND APPRAISAL OOS, FILED
  28. RDER OF SALE ISSUED TO TO SHERIFF WITH APPRAISAL Parcel#(s) 795-22-017
  29. EAL AUCTION
  30. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  31. RAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE $820 PRAECIPE FOR ORDER FOR SALE
  32. UDGMENT ENTRY(54797238) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CAPITAL ONE, N.A. C/O CORP SVC CO, AS RA 1160 DUBLIN ROAD, SUITE 400 COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  33. UDGMENT ENTRY(54797237) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  34. UDGMENT ENTRY(54797236) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  35. UDGMENT ENTRY(54797235) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  36. UDGMENT ENTRY(54797234) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  37. UDGMENT ENTRY(54797233) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ROBERT J BYRNE [email protected]
  38. RDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION AND DECREE OF FORECLOSURE. ORDER SEE JOURNAL. FINAL. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  39. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54509345) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  40. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54509344) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  41. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54509343) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CAPITAL ONE, N.A. C/O CORP SVC CO, AS RA 1160 DUBLIN ROAD, SUITE 400 COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  42. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54509342) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  43. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54509341) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  44. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(54509340) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ROBERT J BYRNE [email protected]
  45. AGISTRATE'S DECISION WITH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FILED AND SENT TO ALL PARTIES ON SERVICE PAGE.
  46. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 06/24/2024, IS GRANTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  47. ASE CALLED FOR HEARING. ONLY PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. NO COURT REPORTER, BUT DIGITALLY RECORDED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION TO ISSUE. NOTICE ISSUED
  48. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53562615 RETURNED 05/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MIKTUK/MATTHEW/D. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  49. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 AFFIDAVIT OF JUSTIN M RITCH
  50. OTICE FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF HEARING
  51. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53562616 RETURNED 05/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  52. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53331096 RETURNED 05/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  53. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53326246 RETURNED 05/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MIKTUK/MATTHEW/D. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  54. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53326247 RETURNED 05/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  55. ELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 08/07/2024 AT 08:45 AM. THE CASE IS SET FOR TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. NOTICE ISSUED
  56. OTICE FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  57. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 AFFIDAVIT REGARDING MILITARY STATUS
  58. OTICE FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING ENTRY ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
  59. OTICE FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
  60. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 08/07/2024 - GRANTED
  61. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53562616 RETURNED 5/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  62. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53562615 RETURNED 5/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MIKTUK/MATTHEW/D. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  63. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53331096 RETURNED 5/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  64. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53331095 RETURNED 5/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MIKTUK/MATTHEW/D. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  65. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53326247 RETURNED 5/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  66. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53326246 RETURNED 5/18/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MIKTUK/MATTHEW/D. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  67. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53562618 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/22/2024 CAPITAL ONE, N.A. PROCESSED BY COC 05/01/2024.
  68. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53562617 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/22/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 05/01/2024.
  69. ON 04/16/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  70. ON 04/16/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED MIKTUK/MATTHEW/D. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  71. ON 04/16/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED MIKTUK/MATTHEW/D. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  72. ON 04/16/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  73. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED MATTHEW D. MIKTUK SERVICE RETURN
  74. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED MATTHEW D. MIKTUK SERVICE RETURN
  75. UMS AMENDED COMPLNT(53562618) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CAPITAL ONE, N.A. C/O CORP SVC CO, AS RA 1160 DUBLIN ROAD, SUITE 400 COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  76. UMS AMENDED COMPLNT(53562617) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  77. UMS AMENDED COMPLNT(53562616) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  78. UMS AMENDED COMPLNT(53562615) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  79. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  80. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  81. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  82. RIT FEE
  83. RIT FEE
  84. RIT FEE
  85. RIT FEE
  86. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  87. UMS AMENDED COMPLNT(53559280) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  88. UMS AMENDED COMPLNT(53559279) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  89. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  90. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  91. RIT FEE
  92. RIT FEE
  93. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  94. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  95. NSWER FILED BY D3 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION ATTORNEY ROBERT J BYRNE 0040299 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
  96. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  97. MENDED COMPLAINT $75 AMENDED COMPLAINT
  98. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53331098 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/25/2024 CAPITAL ONE, N.A. PROCESSED BY COC 04/03/2024.
  99. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53331097 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/25/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 04/03/2024.
  100. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53326249 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/25/2024 CAPITAL ONE, N.A. PROCESSED BY COC 04/03/2024.
  101. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53326248 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/25/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 04/03/2024.
  102. ON 03/18/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  103. ON 03/18/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  104. ON 03/18/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED MIKTUK/MATTHEW/D. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  105. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED RETURN OF SERVICE
  106. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED RETURN OF SERVICE
  107. UMS COMPLAINT(53331098) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CAPITAL ONE, N.A. C/O CORP SVC CO, AS RA 1160 DUBLIN ROAD, SUITE 400 COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  108. UMS COMPLAINT(53331097) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  109. UMS COMPLAINT(53331096) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  110. UMS COMPLAINT(53331095) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  111. UMS COMPLAINT(53326249) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CAPITAL ONE, N.A. C/O CORP SVC CO, AS RA 1160 DUBLIN ROAD, SUITE 400 COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  112. UMS COMPLAINT(53326248) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  113. UMS COMPLAINT(53326247) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  114. UMS COMPLAINT(53326246) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  115. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  116. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  117. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  118. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  119. RIT FEE
  120. RIT FEE
  121. RIT FEE
  122. RIT FEE
  123. AGISTRATE BRIAN S GOZELANCZYK ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  124. UMS COMPLAINT(53327566) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  125. UMS COMPLAINT(53327565) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: MATTHEW D. MIKTUK 26014 PETTIBONE ROAD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  126. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  127. RIT FEE
  128. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  129. RIT FEE
  130. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  131. RIT FEE
  132. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  133. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  134. RIT FEE
  135. RIT FEE
  136. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  137. RIT FEE
  138. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  139. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  140. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  141. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  142. UDGE JOHN D SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  143. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  144. EGAL RESEARCH
  145. EGAL NEWS
  146. EGAL AID
  147. OMPUTER FEE
  148. LERK'S FEE
  149. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  150. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more