Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-15
Status ACTIVE
Type Tort M.v. Accident
Docket 47 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Geneva Johnson
Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company|Christopher Allen Wittenmyer
Photo of Hon. William T McGinty

Judge

Hon. William T McGinty

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  2. LEGAL RESEARCH
  3. LEGAL NEWS
  4. LEGAL AID
  5. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  6. COMPUTER FEE
  7. CLERK'S FEE
  8. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JOSEPH A CONDENI
  9. OTION FILED FOR P1 GENEVA JOHNSON JOSEPH A CONDENI 0030275 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALLOW MEDICAL EXPERT TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL VIA CONTEMPORANEOUS REMOTE TRANSMISSION
  10. OTION IN LIMINE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF MEDICAL EXPENSES
  11. EDIATION HEARING HELD. CASE DID NOT SETTLE AND IS RETURNED TO THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DEENA R CALABRESE (357). THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. OTICE FILED BY D1 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY ATTORNEY JOSEPH G RITZLER 0051934 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DEFENSE MEDICAL EXPERT REPORT
  13. EDIATION SET FOR 01/08/2025 AT 11:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  14. EDIATION SCHEDULED FOR 12/20/2024 AT 01:30 PM IS CANCELLED.
  15. EDIATION SET FOR 12/20/2024 AT 01:30 PM. (Notice Sent).
  16. OTICE OF DEPOSITION OF D1 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY FILED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF
  17. OTICE OF DEPOSITION OF D1 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY FILED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF
  18. ASE MGMNT CONFERENCE HELD ON 06/21/2024. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT STATE FARM PARTICIPATED. NO APPEARANCE BY OR ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT WITTENMYER. DOCKET REFLECTS GOOD SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WITTENMYER, BUT THAT SAID DEFENDANT'S ANSWER DEADLINE REMAINS PENDING. ALL DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 10/25/2024. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 10/25/2024. DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 01/31/2025. CASE REFERRED TO COURT MEDIATION ON 06/25/2024. MEDIATION TO BE HELD AFTER 10/25/2024 AND TO BE COMPLETED BY 12/13/2024. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 03/27/2025 AT 10:00 AM. ALL PARTIES AND CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVES MUST BE PRESENT WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. IF THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS AN INSURANCE COMPANY, CORPORATION, COMMON CARRIER, OR OTHER ENTITY, THEN THE CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE THE PERSON WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO A BINDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS. A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL SEND A REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORIZED TO ACT ON ITS BEHALF. PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO SUBMIT PRETRIAL STATEMENTS AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE FINAL PRETRIAL. THE PRETRIAL STATEMENTS SHALL SET FORTH THE FOLLOWING: (1) STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES; (2) STATEMENT OF REAL FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN DISPUTE; (3) STIPULATIONS; (4) LIST OF NON-EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH A BRIEF SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TESTIMONY; (5) LIST OF EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH REPORTS ATTACHED; (6) SPECIAL LEGAL PROBLEMS ANTICIPATED; (8) PRETRIAL MOTIONS CONTEMPLATED; (9) LATEST DEMAND/OFFER. ON SOME OCCASIONS THE COURT'S SCHEDULE MAY PREVENT THE JUDGE FROM CONDUCTING THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IN PERSON. IF THE ATTORNEYS BELIEVE IT IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY THAT THE JUDGE CONDUCT THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN PERSON, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO CONTACT THE JUDICIAL STAFF ATTORNEY AT LEAST SEVENTY-TWO (72) HOURS IN ADVANCE TO MAKE SUCH A REQUEST. IN ANY INSTANCE WHERE THE JUDGE HAS A CONFLICT, THE COURT WILL RESET THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE JUDGE TO PRESIDE IN PERSON. JURY TRIAL SET FOR 05/12/2025 AT 09:30 AM. ANY MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING AND CAPTIONED "MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE." IF ALL PARTIES OR CERTAIN PARTIES AGREE TO THE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE, SUCH AGREEMENT SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE CAPTION. THE COURT WILL NOT RULE ON AMBIGUOUSLY TITLED MOTIONS WHICH ARE, IN EFFECT, MOTIONS FOR A CONTINUANCE (E.G., A MOTION TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE). ANY MOTION FILED WHICH DOES NOT FULFILL THE CRITERIA ABOVE WILL BE SUMMARILY DENIED OR STRICKEN. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. UMS COMPLAINT(53988006) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WITTENMYER 1149 ORCHARD GROVE DRIVE GENEVA, OH 44041 ANSWER DATE: 07/03/2024
  20. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  21. RIT FEE
  22. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE - SERVE DEF. WITTENMYER VIA ORDINARY MAIL - 06.04.2024
  23. ASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 06/21/2024 AT 09:30 AM. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ORDER SPECIFICALLY REFERENCES CIVIL RULE 26 AS AMENDED EFFECTIVE JULY 2020, IN PARTICULAR THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE PARTIES FILE A WRITTEN DISCOVERY PLAN. THE CMC WILL BE CONDUCTED AS A VIDEO CONFERENCE. DO NOT APPEAR IN PERSON. PLEASE LOG IN TO THE CONFERENCE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME BY VISITING HTTPS://ZOOM.US/JOIN AND ENTERING THE FOLLOWING MEETING CREDENTIALS: MEETING ID: 828 7313 3414 PASSCODE: 061340 THE URL BELOW SHOULD PROVIDE ONE-CLICK ACCESS TO THE CONFERENCE, BUT PLEASE RELY ON THE MEETING ID AND PASSCODE ABOVE IF THE URL PROMPTS YOU FOR AN ID OR PASSCODE, OR RETURNS AN ERROR: HTTPS://US02WEB.ZOOM.US/J/82873133414?PWD=YKTYTKS3ENZXUNLNWUDBSHZUMM54UT09 TO DISCOURAGE ABUSE, ALL COUNSEL AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS PARTICIPATING MUST HAVE AN ACCOUNT WITH THE ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCING SERVICE (HTTPS://ZOOM.US/). A PAID ZOOM ACCOUNT IS NOT REQUIRED; THE FREE TIER IS SUFFICIENT. PRIOR TO THE EVENT, PLEASE DOWNLOAD ZOOM TO A COMPUTER OR MOBILE DEVICE WITH A CAMERA, MICROPHONE, AND SPEAKERS. NEXT, ENSURE INTERNET BROWSER POP-UP BLOCKERS ARE DISABLED FOR ZOOM. FINALLY, CHECK THE CAMERA, MICROPHONE, AND SPEAKERS ON YOUR DEVICE TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE WORKING. IN ADVANCE OF THE CONFERENCE, COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES SHALL CONFER IN ACCORDANCE WITH OHIO R. CIV. P. 26(F)(1)-(2), AND SHALL THEREAFTER FILE A DISCOVERY PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH OHIO R. CIV. P. 26(F)(3). THE WRITTEN RULE 26(F) DISCOVERY PLAN SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN THREE BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. DURING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, SERVICE ISSUES, DISCOVERY PROGRESS AND SCHEDULE, AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY, EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS, DATE FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION, ETC., SHALL BE RESOLVED AND INCLUDED IN A BINDING DECREE AND ORDER FORMALIZED. ALL COUNSEL PARTICIPATING SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. THE PARTIES SHOULD NOT WAIT FOR THE CMC BEFORE BEGINNING TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY. EXCEPT IN COMPLEX CASES, TRIAL WILL BE SCHEDULED 7 TO 9 MONTHS OUT, WITH FINAL PRETRIALS AND/OR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES SCHEDULED FROM 2 TO 6 WEEKS PRIOR TO TRIAL. ANY PARTY WHO FAILS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CMC WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  24. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53690560 RETURNED 5/3/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WITTENMYER/CHRISTOPHER/ALLEN - NO SUCH NUMBER NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  25. UMS COMPLAINT(53690560) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WITTENMYER 1140 ORCHARD GROVE DRIVE GENEVA, OH 44041-0000
  26. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. RIT FEE
  28. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE - SERVE DEF. WITTENMYER VIA ORDINARY MAIL
  29. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53335614 RETURNED 4/26/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WITTENMYER/CHRISTOPHER/ALLEN - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  30. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 GENEVA JOHNSON ATTORNEY JOSEPH A CONDENI 0030275 PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RULE 26(B)(3)
  31. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JOSEPH G RITZLER
  32. NSWER AND CROSSCLAIM $75 ANSWER AND CROSSCLAIM OF STATE FARM
  33. SPS RECEIPT NO. 53335613 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/25/2024 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY PROCESSED BY COC 04/03/2024.
  34. UMS COMPLAINT(53335614) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WITTENMYER 1149 ORCHARD GROVE DRIVE GENEVA, OH 44041
  35. UMS COMPLAINT(53335613) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY ONE STATE FARM PLAZA BLOOMINGTON, IL 61710
  36. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  37. RIT FEE
  38. RIT FEE
  39. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  40. UDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  41. EGAL RESEARCH
  42. EGAL NEWS
  43. EGAL AID
  44. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  45. OMPUTER FEE
  46. LERK'S FEE
  47. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JOSEPH A CONDENI

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more