Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-27
Status Pending
Type Parent Child No Divorce
Docket 18 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ceaser Blate, Jessica Arlene
Defendant Ceaser, Marcell Lamont, Jr|Loera, Nicole Marie
Photo of Hon. Morgan Kali

Judge

Hon. Morgan Kali

Fort Bend County (TX)

Texas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Petition Index # 1 Petition in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship
  2. Order Index # 2 Suit Affecting Parent Child Relationship
  3. Answer/Contest/Response/Waiver Index # 3 Respondent's Waiver of Service Only (Specific Waiver)
  4. Answer/Contest/Response/Waiver Index # 4 Respondent's Waiver of Service Only (Specific Waiver)
  5. Non Jury Trial (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Clayton, LaTosha McGill)
  6. Judge Docket Entry P appeared for final trial on Petition in SAPCR. No other parties appeared. No notice to Respondents. No action taken at this time. Hearing passed. lmc
  7. Proposed Order Index # 5 Order In Suit Affecting Parent-Child Relationship
  8. Prove Up (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Clayton, LaTosha McGill)
  9. Judge Docket Entry All parties appeared. Petitioner appeared in person. Respondents appeared via ZOOM. Parties appeared on prove up of SAPCR. The Court will need additional information regarding Respondent's, Marcell Ceaser, paternity. No action taken at this time. The court referred the parties to the self represented program and texaslawhelp.org and advised the parties that they may need to seek legal advice regarding next steps. lmc
  10. Amended Filing Index # 7 First Ammended Petition insuit Affecting the Parent Child RelationShip
  11. Non Jury Trial (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Morgan, Kali)
  12. No Fee Documents Index # 8 State of Texas Acknowledgment of Paternity
  13. SAPCR (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Morgan, Kali)
  14. Judge Docket Entry All parties appeared self represented for final trial on SAPCR. Record made #250127_0105. Parties sworn. Parties announced an agreement Testimony presented on the agreement. The parties agreed that Mom will continue to provide the current medical on the child. Mom and Dad will pay daycare expenses to Petitioner beginning on 1/27/2025, in lieu of child support. The amount will be the same as the amount in the proposed order. Parties agreed that all child support language shall be stricken at this time on a temporary orders basis. Parties also agreed that the order will be a Temporary order and the Court has set a status hearing for February 3, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. via ZOOM. Parties agreed to the corrections made to the proposed order to conform with the agreements of the parties. The Court signed the Temporary Order. lmc
  15. Temporary Order Index # 9 Temporary Order in Suit Affecting the Parent- Child Relationship
  16. Status Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Clayton, LaTosha McGill) Zoom Hearing
  17. Judge Docket Entry All parties appeared for status hearing via ZOOM. Parties sworn. Record made. Parties stated that they have an agreement regarding final orders. The proposed final order will need to be filed with all party and counsel signatures, if agreed. Final trial set for March 3, 2025 at 9:30 a.m. via ZOOM to prepare the final order and seek legal advice. lmc
  18. Prove Up (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Clayton, LaTosha McGill)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.