Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-11
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 80 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Palmer, Shakil O

Docket Entries

  1. Proof of Service
  2. Comment Party Substituted Served: Shakil O Palmer Date Substituted Served: Declaration attached
  3. Decl Amd Prop Jgm
  4. Proof of Service by Mail
  5. Comment Served: Shakil O Palmer / Mailed on
  6. Return Letter
  7. Comment Answer Received , Returned to Respondent
  8. Answer Filed Family Support
  9. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  10. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the FL-610 was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: DCSS
  11. Notice of Motion
  12. Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Other: Join Other Parent / Hrg: Time: 8am Dept. 302
  13. Proof of Service by Mail
  14. Comment Served: Shakil O Palmer and Shawnitka Jackson / Mailed on
  15. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  16. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  17. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  18. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  19. Result Continued Party's Motion
  20. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  21. Motion Child Support
  22. Original Type Motion Child Support
  23. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  24. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  25. Result Continued Party's Motion
  26. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  27. Motion - Health Care
  28. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  29. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  30. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  31. Result Continued Party's Motion
  32. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  33. General Motion
  34. Original Type General Motion
  35. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  36. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  37. Result Heard
  38. Comment Join Other Parent
  39. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  40. Appeared in Person
  41. Minute Order Corrected/Amended
  42. Comment Corrected: Eff Date
  43. Proof of Service by Mail
  44. Comment Served: Shakil O Palmer and Shawnitks Jackson / Mailed on
  45. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  46. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  47. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  48. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  49. Result Heard
  50. Comment cont'd from to allow Respondent to be present / TSO $544 Resp
  51. Respondent: PALMER, SHAKIL O
  52. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  53. Motion Child Support
  54. Original Type Motion Child Support
  55. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  56. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  57. Result Heard
  58. Respondent: PALMER, SHAKIL O
  59. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  60. Motion - Health Care
  61. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  62. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  63. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  64. Result Heard
  65. Respondent: PALMER, SHAKIL O
  66. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  67. Appeared in Person
  68. Income and Expense Declaration
  69. Proof of Service by Mail
  70. Comment Served: OP - Mailed:
  71. Review
  72. Original Type Review
  73. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  74. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  75. Result Heard
  76. Comment cont'd from on issue of Resp inc after end of benefits in Apr 2024
  77. Respondent: PALMER, SHAKIL O
  78. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.