Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-22
Type Dissolution
Docket 59 entries
Disposition transfer
Photo of Hon. Farris Laura S

Judge

Hon. Farris Laura S

Creek County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL INTERPRETER TRANSLATOR
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SUMMONS - CHRISTINE FLETCHER
  14. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  15. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  16. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  17. CM:LF:NO CSR 3-12-24 - APP. FOR TEMPORARY ORDER -
  18. STRICKEN
  19. ALIAS ORDER SETTING HEARING
  20. CM:LF:NO CSR 4-23-24- APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER - NO SERVICE - STRICKEN
  21. ALIAS ORDER SETTING HEARING
  22. AMENDED PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
  23. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  24. DIEPC: PARTY COMPLETED DIVORCE IMPACT EDUCATIONAL PROG.-SAMANTHA JANE CONKLIN
  25. CM:LF:NO CSR 6/25/24 APP. FOR TEMPORARY ORDER-STEFANIE LORBIECKI PRESENT FOR SHERI WITH PETITIONER-DEFAULT TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT, TO PROVIDE PROOF OF SERVICE
  26. AFFIDAVIT SEEKING SERVICE BY PUBLICATION
  27. ORDER AUTHORIZING SERVICE BY PUBLICATION
  28. SERVICE OF SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION NOTICE
  29. RESPONSE TO AMENDED PETITION FOR DISOSLUTION F MARRIAGE
  30. RESPONSE TO AMENDED APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  31. MOTION TO DISMISS DUE TO IMPROPER VENUE AND LACK OF SERVICE OF PROCESS
  32. PER BALIFF'S CALENDAR COURT SET FOR 12-17-24 @ 11:00
  33. ALIAS ORDER SETTING HEARING
  34. CM:LF:NO CSR:12/17/2024-SHERI PRESENT VIA TEAMS WITH PETITIONER-RESPONDENT PRESENT PRO SE-SET FOR HEARING 1/14/2025 AT 9:30-RESPONDENT TO HAVE AN ATTY OR WILL BE REPRESENTING HERSELF
  35. SUMMONS - CALE WAYNE JOHNSON
  36. SUMMONS - JACOB RAHN
  37. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO FILE HER AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OUT OF TIME
  38. MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO CHALLENGE PATERNITY AND TO ADD 3RD PARTIES
  39. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS WAIVING 30 DAYS
  40. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  41. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  42. CM:LF:NO CSR:1/14/2025-SHERI PRESENT WITH PETITIONER-ZACK PRESENT WITH RESPONDENT-HEARING ON OUTSTANDING MOTION SET 2/10/25 AT 9:30
  43. SERVICE AFFIDAVIT-NOT FOUND
  44. GENERAL ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND WIAVER OF SERVICE-JACOB RAHN
  45. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND WAIVER OF SERVICE-CALE JOHNSON
  46. CM:LF:CSR NIKKI JONES:2/4/2025-SHERI PRESENT WITH PETITIONER-ZACK PRESENT WITH RESPONDENT-CHRISTINE FLETCHER S/E-MS EASTHAM DEMURS TO THE EVIDENCE-ARGUMENTS MADE TO THE COURT-MR WAXMAN WILL NOT BE CHALLENGING VENUE-MS EASTHAM REQUESTS DNA TESTING BE DONE IMMEDIATELY OF THE YOUNGER CHILD-EVEN PRIOR TO THE GAL BEING INVOLVED-COURT ORDERS DNA TESTING FOR BOTH CHILDREN TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 2 WEEKS AND APPOINTS TRAVIS BARNETT AS GAL-COST ASSESSED TO THE RESPONDENT-COURT INSTRUCTS MR WAXMAN TO SPEAK WITH HIS CLIENT REGARDING PATERNITY AND HER TESTIMONY AND IF MR FLETCHER IS NOT THE FATHER SHE SHOULD BE EXPECTED TO BE ARRESTED FOR PERJURY-TEMPORARY ORDER HEARING SE T4/1/2025 AT 930
  47. ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM
  48. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE-TRAVIS BARNETT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM
  49. ORDER DIRECTING GENETIC TESTING
  50. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
  51. MOTION TO WITHDRAW
  52. ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL
  53. CM:LF:NO CSR:4/1/2025-SHERI PRESENT WITH PETITIONER-ZACK PRESENT WITH RESPONDENT-TRAVIS PRESENT-GENETIC TESTING IN THE PROCESS-FATHERS ARE TO REPORT TO LABCORP FOR TESTING-ZACK ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW OVER SHERI'S OBJECTION-REVIEW OF DNA RESULTS SET 5/13/25 AT 930
  54. ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL
  55. CM:LF:CSR NIKKI JONES-MAY 13TH COURT DATE IS CONTINUED TO 6/24/2025 AT 9 30 AM
  56. CM:LF:NIKKI JONES-SHERI PRESENT WITH PETITIONER-RESPONDENT PRESENT VIA TEAMS PRO SE--TRAVIS PRESENT-PETITIONER HAS SUBMITTED TO DNA TESTING-THE MOTHER HAD THE CHILD TESTED BUT HAS NOT PAID FOR THE TESTING-SHE WILL HAVE IT PAID BY 7/1/2025-REVIEW SET 8/26/25 AT 930
  57. CM:LF:NO CSR:8/26/25-NO PARTIES APPEAR-SHERI REQUESTS CONTINUANCE-CNTINUED TO 9/23/25 AT 9:30
  58. CM:LF:NO CSR:9/23/25-PETITIONER PRESENT WITHOUT SHERI-RESPONDENT PRESENT PRO SE VIA TEAMS-TRAVIS PRESENT-DNA RESULTS CONFIRM MR FLETCHER IS THE FATHER-REVIEW SET 12/2/25 AT 930

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more