Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-08
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 40 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Stockton, Eric Andrew
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Proof of Service
  4. Comment Served: Eric Andrew Stockton. Personal Service
  5. Answer Filed Family Support
  6. Income and Expense Declaration
  7. Comment W/attachments
  8. Notice of Motion
  9. Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Join other Parent / Hrg: @ 8am Dept 302
  10. Proof of Service by Mail
  11. Comment Served: Eric Andrew Stockton, Lisa Marie Stockton. Mailed on
  12. Return Letter
  13. Comment The attached Unfiled Request to Withdraw Answer to Complaint is being returned for the following: This is an improper method to withdraw and or strike a pleading or document. You may want to contact and attorney for legal advice and or assistance. You may also want to contact the Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) as to the request of the removal of the hearing from calendar.
  14. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  15. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Unfiled Request to Withdraw Answer to Complaint was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on 05.03.2024. Parties served: Eric Andrew Stockton 6144 North Biarwood Fresno, CA 93711
  16. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  17. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  18. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  19. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  20. Result Heard
  21. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  22. Motion Child Support
  23. Original Type Motion Child Support
  24. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  25. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  26. Result Heard
  27. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  28. Motion - Health Care
  29. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  30. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  31. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  32. Result Heard
  33. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  34. Motion - Joinder
  35. Original Type Motion - Joinder
  36. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  37. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  38. Result Heard
  39. Comment Join other Parent
  40. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more