Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-12-18
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 95 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Vega, Ismael T
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Amended Summons and Complaint
  4. Comment 1st amended
  5. Proof of Service
  6. Comment Served: Isamael T Vega on
  7. Amended Summons and Complaint
  8. Comment 2nd Amended Complaint
  9. Income and Expense Declaration
  10. Comment with attachments
  11. Proof of Service
  12. Comment Decl. of Diligence / Substituted service on
  13. Answer Filed Family Support
  14. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  15. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Answer was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: Department of Child Support Services P.O.Box 12946 Fresno, Ca.93779-2946
  16. Decl Amd Prop Jgm
  17. Proof of Service by Mail
  18. Comment Served: Ismael T Vega. Mailed on
  19. Notice of Motion
  20. Comment Judgment, CS, HC & Other: 2nd amended, parentage & join other parent / Hrg: Time: 8am Dept. 302
  21. Proof of Service by Mail
  22. Comment Date mailed: Served: Ismael T Vega & Bradie L Ansiel
  23. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  24. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  25. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  26. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  27. Result Heard
  28. Motion Child Support
  29. Original Type Motion Child Support
  30. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  31. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  32. Result Heard
  33. Comment child Deliah E Vega
  34. Motion - Health Care
  35. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  36. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  37. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  38. Result Heard
  39. General Motion
  40. Original Type General Motion
  41. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  42. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  43. Result Heard
  44. Comment 2nd Amended
  45. General Motion
  46. Original Type General Motion
  47. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  48. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  49. Result Heard
  50. Comment parentage - child Avayah Marie Vega
  51. General Motion
  52. Original Type General Motion
  53. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  54. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  55. Result Heard
  56. Comment Join other parent
  57. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  58. Appeared in Person
  59. Proof of Service by Mail
  60. Comment Served: RSP/OP - Mailed:
  61. Proof of Service by Mail
  62. Comment Served: OP - Mailed:
  63. Motion Child Support
  64. Original Type Motion Child Support
  65. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  66. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  67. Result Heard
  68. Comment Cont from at mom's request, no transportation/Mom has been joined/Zoom auth/RJ 5/1/24
  69. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  70. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  71. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  72. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  73. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  74. Result Heard
  75. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  76. Motion - Health Care
  77. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  78. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  79. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  80. Result Heard
  81. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  82. General Motion
  83. Original Type General Motion
  84. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  85. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  86. Result Heard
  87. Comment 2nd Amended
  88. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  89. General Motion
  90. Original Type General Motion
  91. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  92. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  93. Result Heard
  94. Comment Parentage
  95. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more