Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-01
Status Judgment
Type 43 Unlimited Other Petition (not Specified)
Docket 75 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ardaiz, James
Defendant County Of Fresno|View Document 2.21.24 Opposition To Pet. For Order Authorizing The Preservation Of Evidence|View Document 2.21.24 Declaration Iso Of Opposition To Petition|View Document 2.21.24 Opposition To Pet. For Order Authorizing The Preservation Of Evidence|View Document 2.21.24 Declaration Iso Of Opposition To Petition
Photo of Hon. Hamilton, Jeffrey Y.

Judge

Hon. Hamilton, Jeffrey Y.

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  25. Original Type Ex Parte Hearing
  26. Judicial Officer Hamilton, Jr., Jeffrey Y.
  27. Hearing Time 3:29 PM
  28. Result Heard
  29. Comment OST on Petition - Warren Paboojian ~ Filed
  30. Minute Order Attachment
  31. View Document Minute Order Attachment w/CM Ex Parte re: OST on Petition
  32. Comment w/Clerks Certificate of Mailing - Ex Parte re: OST on Petition
  33. Appeared in Person
  34. Order filed
  35. View Document Order filed Advancing the Hearing of the Petition for Order Authorizing Preservation of Evi
  36. Judicial Officer Hamilton, Jr., Jeffrey Y.
  37. Comment Advancing the Hearing of the Petition for Order Authorizing Preservation of Evidence By Inspection of Documents, Things, and Places
  38. Amended Document Filed
  39. View Document Amended Notice of Petition
  40. Comment Amended Notice of Petition for Order Authorizing Preservation of Evidence by Inspection of Documents, Things, and Places
  41. Proof of Service
  42. View Document Proof of Service - Paul Nerland, County Administrative Officer, County of Fresno
  43. Comment by Personal Service of Paul Nerland, County Administrative Officer, County of Fresno
  44. Proof of Service
  45. View Document Proof of Service - of James A. Kus
  46. Comment by Personal Service of James A. Kus
  47. Proof of Service
  48. View Document Proof of Service of Daniel C. Cederborg, County Counsel, County of Fresno
  49. Comment by Personal Service of Daniel C. Cederborg, County Counsel, County of Fresno
  50. Opposition filed
  51. View Document 2.21.24 Respondent Opposition to Pet. for Order Authorizing the Preservation of Evidence
  52. Comment Respondent County of Fresno's Opposition to Petition for Order Authorizing the Preservation of Evidence
  53. Declaration Filed
  54. View Document 2.21.24 Declaration ISO of Respondent Opposition to Petition
  55. Comment Declaration of Daniel C. Cederborg In Support of Respondent County of Fresno's Opposition to Petition for Order Authorizing the Preservation of Evidence
  56. Government Exemption Claimed
  57. Notice Filed
  58. View Document 2-22-24 Notice
  59. Comment Respondent County of Fresnos Acknowledgment of New Hearing Date For Petition to Preserve Evidence
  60. Reply filed
  61. View Document Reply to Opp to Petition for Order Authorizing Preservation _ HRG 03/06/24
  62. Comment Reply to Opposition to Petition for Order Authorizing Preservation of Evidence by Inspection of Documents, Things, and Places
  63. Declaration Filed
  64. View Document Declaration of Warren R. Paboojian in Support to Opp - HRG 03/06/24
  65. Comment Declaration of Warren R. Paboojian in Support of Reply to Opposition to Petition for Order Authorizing Preservation of Evidence by Inspection of Documents, Things, and Places
  66. Petition for
  67. Original Type Petition for
  68. Judicial Officer Hamilton, Jr., Jeffrey Y.
  69. Hearing Time 3:27 PM
  70. Result Heard
  71. Comment to Preserve Evidence - Warren Paboojian
  72. Minute Order Attachment (Tentative Rulings Only)
  73. View Document Minute Order Attachment (Tentative Rulings Only) w/CM re: Petition to Preserve Evidence
  74. Comment w/Clerks Certificate of Mailing - re: Petition to Preserve Evidence
  75. Appeared in Person

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more