Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-04-01
Status Disposed
Type Iloc Felony Appeal
Docket 14 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Case Open
  2. Interlocutory Appeal
  3. Motion for Permission for V.R.A.P. 5.1 Appeal TC Denied Motion for Interlocutory Appeal of Denial of Motion to Dismiss for Speedy Trial Violation Filed by: Appellant Cornelius, Christian; Appellate Attorney Pahl, Marshall Motion for Interlocutory Appeal of Denial of Motion to Dismiss for Speedy Trial Violation
  4. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Marshall Pahl, Paul A. Barkus
  5. Case Number Assignment Notice
  6. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Barkus, Paul A.; Appellate Attorney Pahl, Marshall
  7. Motion to Extend Time or Continue State's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Filed by: Appellate Attorney Barkus, Paul A.; Appellee State of Vermont State's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Interlocutory Appeal
  8. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Marshall Pahl, Paul A. Barkus
  9. Entry Regarding Motion - Granted (Judicial Officer: Cohen, William D.)
  10. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Barkus, Paul A.; Appellate Attorney Pahl, Marshall
  11. Motion Response Filed by: Appellate Attorney Barkus, Paul A.; Appellee State of Vermont
  12. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Marshall Pahl, Paul A. Barkus
  13. Final Decision Permission to Appeal Denied PLR/HEE/KRC/WDC/NJW Mandate: Denied
  14. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Barkus, Paul A.; Appellate Attorney Pahl, Marshall

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.