Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- Entered.
- ANNOUNCEMENT: The Justices are soliciting amicus briefs. Whether the Superior Court abused its discretion, either: in ordering the Commonwealth to disclose the user icons/bitmojis and usernames that Boston police used to monitor Snapchat accounts during a certain time period, and/or in dismissing the indictments against the defendant as a sanction for the Commonwealth's noncompliance with the discovery order, including: (1) whether the framework set forth in Commonwealth v. Long, 485 Mass. 711 (2020), for assessing a defendant's claim of racial profiling with regard to traffic stops, and later extended to pedestrian stops in Commonwealth v. Robinson-Van Rader, 492 Mass. 1 (2023), applies to police surveillance of individuals' social media activity; (2) if so, what threshold showing a defendant must make to demonstrate that a request for discovery is material and relevant to establishing a selective enforcement claim concerning police investigation tactics on social media; and (3) whether the requested information in this case was shielded from disclosure under this court's precedents protecting confidential police investigatory information such as surveillance locations.
- Appellee brief filed for Richard Dilworth, Jr. by Attorney Joshua Raisler Cohn.
- The clerk's office has received the appellee's brief through e-fileMA. The brief has been accepted for filing and entered on the docket. The appellee shall file with the clerk 4 copies of the brief within 5 days. The clerk's office may require additional copies if necessary. (Cover of appellee's brief shall be red.)
- Appellant brief filed for Commonwealth by Elisabeth Martino, ADA.
- Appendix filed for Commonwealth by Elisabeth Martino, ADA.
- The clerk's office has received the appellant's brief and appendix through e-fileMA. The brief and appendix have been accepted for filing and entered on the docket. The appellant shall file with the clerk 4 copies of the brief and 3 copies of the appendix within 5 days. The clerk's office may require additional copies if necessary. (Note: Cover of appellant's brief shall be blue and appendix shall be white.)
- Additional 4 copies of appellant's brief and 3 copies of appendix filed by Commonwealth.
- Additional 4 copies of appellee's brief filed by Richard Dilworth, Jr..
- Reply brief filed for Commonwealth by Elisabeth Martino, ADA.
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In
