Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-25
Type Cc Dl Revoc Rvw 302.311 Rs Mo
Docket 35 entries
Disposition St Confess Judmt/Ord Lic Rein

Parties

Defendant Director Of Revenue
Photo of Hon. Bartels Dianna Lynn

Judge

Hon. Bartels Dianna Lynn

Jefferson County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Judge/Clerk - Note 2 CERTIFIED COPIES OF JUDGMENT MAILED TO ATTORNEY OF PETITIONER. 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT SENT DOR.
  3. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  4. St Confess Judmt/Ord Lic Rein The Director of Revenue is hereby ORDERED to reinstate the license or permit to drive of the above named PETITIONER if Petitioner is otherwise qualified, pursuant to Section 577.041 RSMo (2002), and concerning Director of Revenue Case Number CH22003275 revocation effective on 06/08/2022 Chemical Test Refusal. Costs are assessed to Petitioner. SO ORDERED: DIANNA BARTELS, CIRCUIT JUDGE DIV. THREE
  5. St Confess Judmt/Ord Lic Rein Associated Entries: 08/16/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 08/16/2022 - Civil Setting Scheduled Scheduled For: 11/22/2022; 1:30 PM; DIANNA LYNN BARTELS; Jefferson
  6. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  7. Judgment Filed judgment and final order on petition for review of chemical test refusal; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: THOMAS EAGLETON HOLLINGSWORTH
  8. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  9. Civil Setting Scheduled Associated Entries: 09/26/2022 - St Confess Judmt/Ord Lic Rein Scheduled For: 11/22/2022; 1:30 PM; DIANNA LYNN BARTELS; Jefferson
  10. Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 05/26/2022 - Civil Setting Scheduled Associated Entries: 09/26/2022 - St Confess Judmt/Ord Lic Rein Hearing Continued From: 08/16/2022; 1:30 PM Civil Setting
  11. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  12. DOR Cert Driving Record Filed dor packet; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: THOMAS EAGLETON HOLLINGSWORTH
  13. Standard Discovery Filed voluntary disclosure to petitioner; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: THOMAS EAGLETON HOLLINGSWORTH
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Certificate of Mailing ELECTRONICALLY CERTIFIED COPY OF STAY ORDER EMAILED TO ATTORNEY OF RECORD AND MAILED TO DOR
  16. Order for Stay SO ORDERED: DIANNA BARTELS, CIRCUIT JUDGE DIV. THREE
  17. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  18. Proposed Order Filed Consented Proposed Stay Order; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. SENT TO JUDGE Filed By: TRAVIS LAVERN NOBLE On Behalf Of: JASON MATTHEW ZIEGELMEYER
  19. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  20. Retn Serv-Reg/Cert Mail Succs Document ID - 22-SMCC-796; Served To - DIRECTOR OF REVENUE; Server - ; Served Date - 03-JUN-22; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Certified Mail; Reason Description - Served
  21. Notice of Service EXHIBIT B; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: TRAVIS LAVERN NOBLE On Behalf Of: JASON MATTHEW ZIEGELMEYER
  22. Certificate of Service CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: TRAVIS LAVERN NOBLE
  23. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  24. Notice of Service EXHIBIT A; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: TRAVIS LAVERN NOBLE On Behalf Of: JASON MATTHEW ZIEGELMEYER
  25. Certificate of Service CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: TRAVIS LAVERN NOBLE
  26. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  27. Memorandum Filed EOA APA T. HOLLINGSWORTH; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: THOMAS EAGLETON HOLLINGSWORTH
  28. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  29. Civil Setting Scheduled Associated Entries: 08/16/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Scheduled For: 08/16/2022; 1:30 PM; DIANNA LYNN BARTELS; Jefferson
  30. Summons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 22-SMCC-796, for DIRECTOR OF REVENUE.
  31. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  32. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: TRAVIS LAVERN NOBLE
  33. Proposed Order Filed PROPOSED STAY ORDER. NEED PROSECUTING ATTORNEY APPROVAL/DENIAL. Filed By: TRAVIS LAVERN NOBLE On Behalf Of: JASON MATTHEW ZIEGELMEYER
  34. Mot to Produce Documents MOTION TO PRODUCE. Filed By: TRAVIS LAVERN NOBLE
  35. Pet Filed in Circuit Ct PETITION FOR REVIEW.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix and motion outcomes. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more