Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-22
Status Disposed
Type Defamation
Docket 72 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mc Namara, Sean
Defendant Bartolomei, Edward A.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. New Cases Filed (OCA)
  2. PETITION
  3. STATEMENT OF INABILITY TO AFFORD PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS
  4. REQUEST FOR SERVICE AND PROCESS
  5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROPRIA PERSONA PARTY
  6. SERVICE ASSIGNED TO CLERK 3
  7. Unserved
  8. erved: 02/28/2024
  9. ETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  10. arty:
  11. efendant Bartolomei, Edward A.
  12. xhibits
  13. OTION TO SET
  14. RIGINAL ANSWER OF
  15. OTION TO
  16. etter
  17. ETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  18. arty:
  19. efendant Bartolomei, Edward A.
  20. etter
  21. EQUEST FOR
  22. OTION TO
  23. EQUEST FOR
  24. EQUEST FOR
  25. ESPONSE
  26. etter
  27. etter
  28. etter
  29. ERVICE ASSIGNED TO CLERK 2
  30. EQUEST FOR SERVICE AND PROCESS
  31. EQUEST FOR SERVICE AND PROCESS
  32. BJECTIONS TO
  33. ETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  34. ETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  35. ETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  36. NSWER
  37. NSWER
  38. ESPONSE
  39. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  40. ROPOSED ORDER
  41. ESPONSE
  42. OTION TO QUASH
  43. OTION TO
  44. BJECTIONS TO
  45. OTICE OF HEARING
  46. ESPONSE
  47. OTICE OF ORDER POSTCARD RULE 306A
  48. OTICE
  49. RIGINAL
  50. OTION FOR

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase