Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-20
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 41 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Denis Ticak
Photo of Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Judge

Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMS COMPLAINT(53131626) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DENIS TICAK 25761 DANIELLE DR WESTLAKE, OH 44145
  2. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  3. WRIT FEE
  4. JUDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  5. LEGAL RESEARCH
  6. LEGAL NEWS
  7. LEGAL AID
  8. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  9. COMPUTER FEE
  10. CLERK'S FEE
  11. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN
  12. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995534) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  13. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995533) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  14. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995532) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  15. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995531) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SEAN M. WINTERS [email protected]
  16. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995530) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  17. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995529) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRIS K VELAYUDHAN [email protected]
  18. PON REVIEW OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, WHICH DEFENDANT HAS NOT OPPOSED, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE COURT HEREBY RENDERS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $10,011.59 TOGETHER WITH INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT AT THE STATUTORY RATE OF 8.00% PER ANNUM AND COSTS OF $258.95. THIS ENTRY TERMINATES THE CASE AND IS A FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10/07/2024 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  20. OTICE FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID MULLEN 0089053 NOTICE OF SERVICE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  21. OTICE FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID MULLEN 0089053 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  22. NSCHEDULED EVENT HELD ON 04/30/2024. DEFENDANT FILED AN UNTIMELY ANSWER 04/25/2024. SUA SPONTE, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE, THE COURT GRANTS DEFENDANT LEAVE AND ACCEPTS THE ANSWER. DEFAULT PROCEEDINGS CANCELED. THE LITIGATION SCHEDULE WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: ALL DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 07/26/2024. DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO BE FILED BY 08/30/2024. RESPONSE/REPLY DUE PER OHIO R. CIV. P. 6(C). THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY PLACED ON NOTICE THAT IF THIS MATTER IS NOT RESOLVED THROUGH NEGOTIATIONS OR DISPOSITIVE MOTION PRACTICE, THE COURT CONTEMPLATES A LOCAL RULE 21.0 REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 01/30/2025 AT 10:00 AM. ALL PARTIES AND CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVES MUST BE PRESENT WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. IF THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS AN INSURANCE COMPANY, CORPORATION, COMMON CARRIER, OR OTHER ENTITY, THEN THE CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE THE PERSON WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO A BINDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS. A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL SEND A REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORIZED TO ACT ON ITS BEHALF. PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO SUBMIT PRETRIAL STATEMENTS AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE FINAL PRETRIAL. THE PRETRIAL STATEMENTS SHALL SET FORTH THE FOLLOWING: (1) STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES; (2) STATEMENT OF REAL FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN DISPUTE; (3) STIPULATIONS; (4) LIST OF NON-EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH A BRIEF SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TESTIMONY; (5) LIST OF EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH REPORTS ATTACHED; (6) SPECIAL LEGAL PROBLEMS ANTICIPATED; (8) PRETRIAL MOTIONS CONTEMPLATED; (9) LATEST DEMAND/OFFER. ON SOME OCCASIONS THE COURT'S SCHEDULE MAY PREVENT THE JUDGE FROM CONDUCTING THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IN PERSON. IF THE ATTORNEYS BELIEVE IT IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY THAT THE JUDGE CONDUCT THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN PERSON, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO CONTACT THE JUDICIAL STAFF ATTORNEY AT LEAST SEVENTY-TWO (72) HOURS IN ADVANCE TO MAKE SUCH A REQUEST. IN ANY INSTANCE WHERE THE JUDGE HAS A CONFLICT, THE COURT WILL RESET THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE JUDGE TO PRESIDE IN PERSON. JURY TRIAL SET FOR 02/26/2025 AT 09:30 AM. ANY MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING AND CAPTIONED "MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE." IF ALL PARTIES OR CERTAIN PARTIES AGREE TO THE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE, SUCH AGREEMENT SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE CAPTION. THE COURT WILL NOT RULE ON AMBIGUOUSLY TITLED MOTIONS WHICH ARE, IN EFFECT, MOTIONS FOR A CONTINUANCE (E.G., A MOTION TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE). ANY MOTION FILED WHICH DOES NOT FULFILL THE CRITERIA ABOVE WILL BE SUMMARILY DENIED OR STRICKEN. NOTICE ISSUED
  23. EFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/21/2024 AT 08:30 AM IS CANCELLED.
  24. NSWER OF DENIS TICAK . (JURY TRIAL REQUESTED) PRO SE (9999999)
  25. EFAULT HEARING SET FOR 05/21/2024 AT 08:30 AM. NON-ORAL DEFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR THE DATE AND TIME REFERENCED ABOVE. DO NOT APPEAR AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR THE NON-ORAL HEARING. PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO FILE A RULE 55 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT NO LATER THAN TUESDAY, 04/30/2024. PLAINTIFF IS ALSO ORDERED TO FILE, ALONG WITH THE MOTION, AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES, A MILITARY AFFIDAVIT, A SERVICE AFFIDAVIT, AND ANY OTHER EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE MOTION. PLAINTIFF MUST ALSO SUBMIT A PROPOSED JOURNAL ENTRY. THE PROPOSED ENTRY MUST BE SUBMITTED AS A PROPOSED ORDER IN MS WORD FORMAT, NOT FILED ON THE DOCKET AS A PDF. IF NECESSARY, COUNSEL SHOULD CONSULT THE E-FILING USER MANUAL OR CONTACT THE E-FILING HELP DESK. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT ORDER CAN RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE, WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE, FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. DEFENDANT WILL HAVE UNTIL AND INCLUDING FRIDAY, 05/17/2024 TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION. NON-ORAL HEARING WILL BE HELD TUESDAY, 05/21/2024. NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GIVEN. COUNSEL AND PARTIES ARE NOT TO APPEAR AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR THE NON-ORAL HEARING. NOTICE ISSUED
  26. UMS COMPLAINT(53327985) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: DENIS TICAK 25761 DANIELLE DR WESTLAKE, OH 44145 ANSWER DATE: 04/15/2024
  27. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  28. RIT FEE
  29. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED VIA REGULAR MAIL
  30. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53131626 RETURNED 3/15/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT TICAK/DENIS / - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  31. UMS COMPLAINT(53131626) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DENIS TICAK 25761 DANIELLE DR WESTLAKE, OH 44145
  32. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  33. RIT FEE
  34. UDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  35. EGAL RESEARCH
  36. EGAL NEWS
  37. EGAL AID
  38. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  39. OMPUTER FEE
  40. LERK'S FEE
  41. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.