Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-22
Status Judgment
Type E Filing: Petition Harassment (without Violence)
Docket 40 entries
Disposition pending

Parties

Plaintiff Marsh, Nancy A
Defendant Huebert, Charlene
Photo of Hon. Tharpe, D. Tyler

Judge

Hon. Tharpe, D. Tyler

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Appeared in Person
  2. Request for orders to stop Harassment filed
  3. Order Received for Signature Comment Forwarded to: 402 Order for: Notice of Hearing
  4. Order Received for Signature Comment Forwarded to: 402 Order for: TRO
  5. Order Received for Signature Comment (Pending Hearing) Order After Hearing
  6. Chambers Work- Pre Original Type Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  7. Chambers Work- Pre Original Type Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  8. TRO Petition Denied Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel Comment However a hearing has been set Date: Time: 8:30am Dept: 402
  9. Show Cause Regard Harassment Original Type Show Cause Regard Harassment Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  10. Request Filed Comment to Cont Court Hearing
  11. Request to Continue CHRO Hearing (NO TRO) Comment Date: Time: 8:30am Dept: 402
  12. Minute Order Attachment
  13. Appeared in Person
  14. Proof of Service Comment Request to stop harassment, Notice of hearing, and response packet
  15. Show Cause Regard Harassment Original Type Show Cause Regard Harassment Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  16. Minute Order Attachment
  17. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  18. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  19. TRO Petition Denied
  20. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  21. Comment However a hearing has been set Date: Time: 8:30am Dept: 402
  22. Show Cause Regard Harassment
  23. Original Type Show Cause Regard Harassment
  24. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  25. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  26. Result Heard
  27. Request Filed
  28. Comment to Cont Court Hearing
  29. Request to Continue CHRO Hearing (NO TRO)
  30. Comment Date: Time: 8:30am Dept: 402
  31. Minute Order Attachment
  32. Appeared in Person
  33. Proof of Service
  34. Comment Request to stop harassment, Notice of hearing, and response packet
  35. Show Cause Regard Harassment
  36. Original Type Show Cause Regard Harassment
  37. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  38. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  39. Result Heard
  40. Minute Order Attachment

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more