Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-02
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 63 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Rolph, Noah
Photo of Hon. Dalesandro Samuel

Judge

Hon. Dalesandro Samuel

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Child Custody and Visitation Order Signed by Judge
  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Proof of Service Comment Served by Mail; Declaration of Diligence; Served 02/27/2024 by Substituted Service
  4. Answer Filed Family Support
  5. Income and Expense Declaration
  6. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Answer and I/E filed was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on 03/20/24. Parties served: County of Fresno
  7. Notice of Motion Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Join other parent / HRG: @ 8AM Dept 302
  8. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Noah Rolph and Marissa C Lundeen / Mailed on
  9. Income and Expense Declaration
  10. Response to Governmental Notice of Motion Comment Response to Governmental NOM or OSC/Hrg Date: @8am Dept:302
  11. Income and Expense Declaration
  12. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Respondent: ROLPH, NOAH Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  13. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Respondent: ROLPH, NOAH Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  14. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Respondent: ROLPH, NOAH Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  15. Motion - Joinder Original Type Motion - Joinder Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Join other parent Parties Present Respondent: ROLPH, NOAH Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  16. Appeared in Person
  17. Minute Order Corrected/Amended Comment Corrected: Filing Date
  18. Order Granting Waiver of Court Fees and Cost Signed
  19. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
  20. Initial OSC/Motion - Re: Custody/Visitation Comment Hrg: Time: 8:30am Dept. 303
  21. Proof of Service
  22. Proof of Service Comment Personal
  23. Declaration Filed
  24. Initial OSC/Motion Original Type Initial OSC/Motion Judicial Officer Dalesandro, Samuel Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard Comment cc, cv
  25. Appeared in Person
  26. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  27. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  28. Result Heard
  29. Respondent: ROLPH, NOAH
  30. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  31. Motion - Health Care
  32. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  33. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  34. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  35. Result Heard
  36. Respondent: ROLPH, NOAH
  37. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  38. Motion - Joinder
  39. Original Type Motion - Joinder
  40. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  41. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  42. Result Heard
  43. Comment Join other parent
  44. Respondent: ROLPH, NOAH
  45. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  46. Appeared in Person
  47. Minute Order Corrected/Amended
  48. Comment Corrected: Filing Date
  49. Order Granting Waiver of Court Fees and Cost Signed
  50. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
  51. Initial OSC/Motion - Re: Custody/Visitation
  52. Comment Hrg: Time: 8:30am Dept. 303
  53. Proof of Service
  54. Proof of Service
  55. Comment Personal
  56. Declaration Filed
  57. Initial OSC/Motion
  58. Original Type Initial OSC/Motion
  59. Judicial Officer Dalesandro, Samuel
  60. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  61. Result Heard
  62. Comment cc, cv
  63. Appeared in Person

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more