Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-12
Type Civil Collection
Docket 57 entries
Disposition affirmed

Docket Entries

  1. pinion Certified Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David Notice Date: 05/21/2024
  2. ocument Transmitted
  3. pinion Issued Memorandum Decision MEMORANDUM DECISION Affirmed - Mathias, J. May, J., and Vaidik, J., concur. Judicial Officer: Mathias, Paul D. Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David File Stamp: 03/25/2024
  4. ocument Transmitted
  5. ase Fully Briefed Oral Argument Requested: No FB Date: 02/26/2024
  6. ransmitted to Court of Appeals
  7. rief - Appellant Reply Brief - Appellant Reply Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 02/22/24 Attorney: Chen, Xin Attorney: Hsieh, Nathaniel Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof File Stamp: 02/22/2024
  8. otice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Reply Brief Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David File Stamp: 02/22/2024
  9. ocument Transmitted
  10. eceived Document Receive Date: 02/20/24 Appellant's Reply Brief. The certificate of service indicates the wrong document being served. PostmarkDate: 02/20/2024
  11. otice of Defect Issued Appellant's Reply Brief Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David Issue Date: 02/21/2024
  12. ocument Transmitted
  13. ppendix Filed Volumes of Appendices: Two (2) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 02/02/24 Attorney: Danielson, Nathan Attorney: Jurkiewicz, David Party: NextGear Capital, Inc. File Stamp: 02/02/2024
  14. otice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Appellee's Appendix Party: NextGear Capital, Inc. Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David File Stamp: 02/02/2024
  15. ocument Transmitted
  16. rief - Appellee Brief - Appellee Certificate of Service- Electronically Served and Mailed 02/02/24 Attorney: Danielson, Nathan Attorney: Jurkiewicz, David Party: NextGear Capital, Inc. File Stamp: 02/02/2024
  17. eceived Document Receive Date: 02/02/24 Appellee's Appendix - certificate of service states incorrect document being served. PostmarkDate: 02/02/2024
  18. otice of Defect Issued Appellee's Appendix Party: NextGear Capital, Inc. Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David Issue Date: 02/02/2024
  19. ocument Transmitted
  20. rder Issued order denying appellee's MTD and granting in part appellant's motion to reinstate Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal is denied. 2. Appellants' Motion to Reinstate Appellants' Original Brief Filing and Filing Date is granted in part. 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file, as of the date of this order, Appellants' Brief and Appendix that were received on December 28, 2023. 4. Appellee's Brief is due within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Bailey, Brown, JJ., Najam, Sr. J., concur. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David File Stamp: 01/05/2024
  21. rief and Appendix - Appellant Brief - Appellants' Brief - Appealed Order Volumes of Appendix: Two (2) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 12/28/23 (as stated) Attorney: Chen, Xin Attorney: Hsieh, Nathaniel Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof File Stamp: 01/05/2024
  22. ocument Transmitted
  23. otice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Motion to Reinstate Appellant's Original Briefing and Filing Date Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David File Stamp: 12/18/2023
  24. esponse to Motion to Dismiss Appellants' Response to Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 12/28/23 Attorney: Chen, Xin Attorney: Hsieh, Nathaniel Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof File Stamp: 12/28/2023
  25. otice of Supplemental Filing In Support of Motion for Reinstatement of Original Brief Filing Date Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 12/28/23 Attorney: Chen, Xin Attorney: Hsieh, Nathaniel Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof File Stamp: 12/28/2023
  26. eceived Document Brief - Appellants' Brief - Appealed Order Receive Date: 12/28/23 Appellants' Brief & Two (2) volume Appendix - pending order from Court PostmarkDate: 12/28/2023
  27. ocument Transmitted
  28. ocument Filed Motion to Reinstate Original Filing Date of Appellants' Brief Motion to Reinstate Appellants' Original Brief Filing and Filing Date Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 12/18/23 Attorney: Hsieh, Nathaniel Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof File Stamp: 12/18/2023
  29. otion to Dismiss Motion to Dismiss- Appellee Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 12/14/23 Attorney: Danielson, Nathan Attorney: Jurkiewicz, David Party: NextGear Capital, Inc. File Stamp: 12/14/2023
  30. eceived Document Receive Date: 12/11/23 Motion to Reinstate Appellant's Original Briefing and Filing Date- certificate of service is missing date of service PostmarkDate: 12/11/2023
  31. eceived Document Receive Date: 12/11/23 Appellant's Appendix- Volume 2 is not paginated correctly PostmarkDate: 12/11/2023
  32. otice of Defect Not Cured Letter Issued Clerk Comments:Appellant's Appendix- Volume 2 is not paginated correctly Brief must be retendered with appealed order attached as separate PDF to cure pending defect Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David Issue Date: 12/12/2023
  33. ocument Transmitted
  34. otice of Defect Issued Motion to Reinstate Appellant's Original Briefing and Filing Date Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David Issue Date: 12/12/2023
  35. ocument Transmitted
  36. rder Granting Temporary Admission order granting temp admission Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. The petition for temporary admission is granted. 2. Nathaniel K. Hsieh is now admitted on temporary admission for Appellants. 3. Attorney Nathaniel K. Hsieh is hereby ordered to comply with the requirements of Admission and Discipline Rule 3, Section 2(a). Failure to do so will subject Nathaniel K. Hsieh to discipline. See Admis. Disc. R. 3, sec. 2(c). 4. Co-counsel is directed to comply with Admission and Discipline Rule 3, Section 2(b), including the requirement that all documents filed in this case be signed by a member of the bar of the State of Indiana. 5. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to Nathaniel K. Hsieh and to all other counsel of record. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Jurkiewicz, David File Stamp: 12/06/2023
  37. ocument Transmitted
  38. etition for Temporary Admission Petition for Temporary Admission Petition for Temporary Admission - receipt Petition for Temporary Admission - new-admission Petition for Temporary Admission - ILBar.standingcert Petition for Temporary Admission - NYCertificate Certificate of Service-Electronically Served 11/30/23 Attorney: Chen, Xin Attorney: Hsieh, Nathaniel Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof File Stamp: 11/30/2023
  39. otice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Petition for Temporary Admission Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David File Stamp: 11/30/2023
  40. ocument Transmitted
  41. eceived Document Receive Date: 11/20/23 Petition for Temporary Admission of Nathaniel Hsieh - Petition lacks a certificate of service, missing certificate of good standing and is not signed by Indiana co-counsel. PostmarkDate: 11/20/2023
  42. otice of Defect Issued Petition for Temporary Admission of Nathaniel Hsieh Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David Issue Date: 11/21/2023
  43. ocument Transmitted
  44. ote In addition to the Notice of Defect issued for the appellant's appendix and brief. Out of state attorney was listed on documents but temporary admission has not been sought at the appellate court level
  45. ocument Not Corrected Pursuant to Notice of Defect Issued Clerk Comments: Appellant's Brief and Appendix Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David Date Sent: 11/13/2023
  46. ocument Transmitted
  47. eceived Document Receive Date: 10/18/23 Appellant's Brief- appealed order must be attached as separate PDF PostmarkDate: 10/18/2023
  48. otice of Defect Issued Appellant's Brief Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David Issue Date: 10/19/2023
  49. ocument Transmitted
  50. eceived Document Receive Date: 10/18/23 Appellant's Appendix- Volume one of appendix can only contain the table of contents and not additional documents. Additional volumes contain the actual documents within 250 pages. Missing a Certificate of Service and Verification of Accuracy. PostmarkDate: 10/18/2023
  51. otice of Defect Issued Appellant's Appendix Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof Serve: Bruno, Christina Serve: Chen, Xin Serve: Danielson, Nathan Serve: Hsieh, Nathaniel Serve: Jurkiewicz, David Issue Date: 10/19/2023
  52. ocument Transmitted
  53. otice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Requested/Not Available Method of Service Not Provided/Not Specified 09/19/23 File Stamp: 09/19/2023
  54. ppearance (Jurkiewicz, Danielson) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 09/15/23 Attorney: Danielson, Nathan Attorney: Jurkiewicz, David Party: NextGear Capital, Inc. File Stamp: 09/15/2023
  55. otice of Appeal Filed Certificate of Service-Mailed 09/12/23 Attorney: Chen, Xin Attorney: Hsieh, Nathaniel Party: Mucha, Aneta Party: Rzadkosz, Krzysztof File Stamp: 09/12/2023
  56. OA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 09/13/2023
  57. ocument Transmitted

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more