Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-11-22
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 73 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Chairez Lopez, Fernando
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  6. Proof of Service by Mail
  7. Comment Party Served: Fernando Chairez Lopez Date Mailed:
  8. Return Letter
  9. Comment FL-610
  10. Answer Filed Family Support
  11. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  12. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Answer was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: Department of Child Support Services P.O.Box 12946 Fresno, Ca.93779-2946
  13. Notice of Motion
  14. Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Join other Parent / Hrg: @ 8am Dept 302
  15. Proof of Service by Mail
  16. Comment Served: Fernando Chairez Lopez, Brenda Pena. Mailed on
  17. Proof of Service by Mail
  18. Comment Date mailed: Served: Brenda Pena
  19. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  20. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  21. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  22. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  23. Result Continued Party's Motion
  24. Respondent: CHAIREZ LOPEZ, FERNANDO
  25. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  26. Motion Child Support
  27. Original Type Motion Child Support
  28. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  29. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  30. Result Continued Party's Motion
  31. Respondent: CHAIREZ LOPEZ, FERNANDO
  32. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  33. Motion - Health Care
  34. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  35. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  36. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  37. Result Continued Party's Motion
  38. Respondent: CHAIREZ LOPEZ, FERNANDO
  39. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  40. Motion - Joinder
  41. Original Type Motion - Joinder
  42. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  43. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  44. Result Heard
  45. Comment Join other Parent
  46. Respondent: CHAIREZ LOPEZ, FERNANDO
  47. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  48. Appeared in Person
  49. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  50. Proof of Service by Mail
  51. Comment Served by Mail
  52. Proof of Service by Mail
  53. Comment Date mailed: Served: Fernando Chairez Lopez & Brenda Pena
  54. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  55. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  56. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  57. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  58. Result Heard
  59. Comment cont'd from to allow OP to be present without child / $667 Temp Order Resp / OP auth Zoom
  60. Motion Child Support
  61. Original Type Motion Child Support
  62. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  63. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  64. Result Heard
  65. Motion - Health Care
  66. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  67. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  68. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  69. Result Heard
  70. Respondent: CHAIREZ LOPEZ, FERNANDO
  71. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  72. Income and Expense Declaration
  73. Appeared in Person

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more