Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-29
Status Disposition Filed/Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Child Custody
Docket 43 entries
Disposition dismiss the appeal
Photo of Hon. Kunin, Israel

Judge

Hon. Kunin, Israel

Nevada Appellate Court

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Filed Order Dismissing Appeal and Regarding Motions. The parties move to dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 85089, return the appeal in Docket No. 85370 to the fast track program, and remand this matter to allow the district court to adopt the parties' settlement agreement and allow the parties to implement that agreement. The joint motion to dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 85089 is granted. "The appeal in Docket No. 85089 dismissed." The parties shall bear their own costs. Natalie's motion to instruct the district court or remand this matter, and the parties' joint motion for a limited remand, are denied. The parties' joint motion to return the appeal in Docket No. 85370 to the fast track program is granted. Natalie shall have 21 days from the date of this order to file and serve her fast track statement and appendix. Karla M. Soto's motion for an extension of time to file transcripts in this matter is granted. NRAP 9(c)(4). Ms. Soto's certificate of delivery was filed on April 17, 2023. fn1 [The parties' motions for extensions of time to file the fast track statement and opening brief are denied as moot.] (SC)
  2. Filed Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SEALED) (SC)
  3. Issued Notice to File Case Appeal Statement/Civil. Due date: 7 days. (SC)
  4. Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. No action will be taken on this matter until filing fee is paid. Due Date: 7 days. (SC)
  5. Filed Case Appeal Statement. (SC)
  6. Filing Fee Paid. $250.00 from Standish Law Group. Check no. 1433. (SC)
  7. Issued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program. Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed. Docketing Statement mailed to counsel for appellant - due: 21 days. (SC)
  8. Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Issued Assignment Notice to NRAP 16 Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Israel Kunin. (SC)
  9. Filed Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Premature Appeal. (SC)
  10. Filed Amended Certificate of Service - Motion to Dismiss Appeal. (SC)
  11. Filed Order Denying Motion. Respondent has filed a motion requesting this court to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion is denied. This denial is without prejudice to respondent's right to renew the motion, if necessary, upon completion of settlement proceedings. (SC)
  12. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellant's docketing statement due: September 6, 2022. (SC)
  13. Filed ECAR/Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is appropriate for mediation and a settlement conference is scheduled for October 3, 2022, at 9:00 AM. (SC)
  14. Filed Docketing Statement Civil Appeals. (SC)
  15. Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: October 24, 2022, at 9:00 AM. (SC)
  16. Filed Appellant's Substitution of Attorneys (Bruce I. Shapiro and Shann D. Winesett in place of Thomas J. Standish). (SC)
  17. Filed Order. The clerk of this court shall add attorneys Bruce I. Shapiro and Shann D. Winesett of Pecos Law Group in place and stead of attorneys Thomas J. Standish and Carlia S. Waite of Standish Law Group as counsel for appellant. (SC)
  18. Filed Final Report/No Settlement. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. Counsel worked together to try to resolve some of the outstanding issues. Case Nos. 85089/85370. (SC)
  19. Filed Order Reinstating Briefing Pursuant to NRAP 3E. Appellant(s): 14 days transcript request; 40 days fast track statement and appendix. (SC)
  20. Filed Request for Rough Draft Transcript(s). Transcripts requested: 4/14/20, 6/10/20, 8/25/20, 10/6/20, 11/30/20, 1/19/21, 2/3/21, 4/15/21, 5/10/21, 6/24/21, 8/23/21, 9/22/21, 10/6/21, 11/29/21, 12/7/21, 1/5/22, 2/3/22, 3/14/22, 3/23/22, 5/5/22, 5/26/22, 6/1/22, and 9/7/22. Court Reporter: Center Transcript Video Services. (SC)
  21. Filed Order Consolidating Appeals. This court hereby consolidates these appeals. Douglas Gennardo (Douglas) shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve the fast track statement in Docket No. 85089. The fast track statement shall not exceed 16 pages or the equivalent type-volume limitation. See NRAP 3E(e)(2). Natalie Gennardo (Natalie) shall have 21 days from service of Douglas's fast track statement to file and serve a combined fast track response in Docket No. 85089 and fast track statement in Docket No. 85370. Natalie's combined filing shall not exceed 15 pages or the equivalent type-volume limitation. Douglas shall have 21 days from service of Natalie's combined filing to file and serve a combined fast track reply in Docket No. 85089 and fast track response in Docket No. 85370. Douglas's combined filing shall not exceed 15 pages or the equivalent type-volume limitation. Natalie shall have 14 days from service of Douglas's combined filing to file and serve a fast track reply in Docket No. 85370. The fast track reply shall not exceed 5 pages or the equivalent type-volume limitation. Nos 85089/85370. (SC)
  22. Filed Court Reporter's Motion to Extend Time to File Transcripts. (SC)
  23. Filed Order Granting Motion and Regarding Briefing. Karla M. Soto of Verbatim Reporting & Transcription (VRT) has filed a motion for an extension of time to prepare the transcripts requested in these appeals. VRT shall have until January 3, 2023, to file the requested transcripts in the district court, deliver copies to the requesting party, and file a notice with this court that the completed transcripts have been filed and delivered. Given this extension, fast track statement is due February 2, 2023. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  24. Filed Natalie Gennardo's Motion to Expand Fast Track Page Length. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  25. Filed Appellant's Response to Motion to Expand Fast Track Page Length and Countermotion for Removal from Fast Track Program and to Direct Full Briefing. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  26. Filed Respondent's Reply Re: Motion to Expand Fast track Page Length. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  27. Filed Notice from Court Reporter. Maria Balagtas stating that the requested transcripts were delivered. Dates of transcripts: 9/22/21, 10/6/21, 11/29/21, 12/7/21, 1/5/22, 2/3/22, 3/14/22, 3/23/22, 5/5/22, 5/26/22, 6/1/22, and 9/7/22. (SC)
  28. Filed Order Regarding Motions. Natalie Gennardo has filed a motion for leave to file a combined fast track response in Docket No. 85089 and fast track statement in Docket No. 85370 consisting of 21 pages. Douglas Gennardo has filed a countermotion to remove these appeals from the fast track program and direct full briefing. Natalie's motion is granted and Douglas's motion is denied. Douglas's fast track statement and appendix remain due to be filed by February 2, 2023. (SC)
  29. Filed Appellant's Motion for Excess Pages to Expand Length of Fast Track Statement. Nos. 85089/85370. (SC)
  30. Filed Appellant's Motion for Excess Pages to Expand Length of Fast Track Statement. Nos. 85089/85370. (SC)
  31. Filed Order Granting Motion. Douglas Gennardo's untimely motion for leave to file a fast track statement in excess of 16 pages is granted. Douglas shall have until February 2, 2023, to file and serve a fast track statement in Docket No. 85089 that does not exceed 21 pages or the equivalent type-volume limitation. Nos. 85089/85370. (SC)
  32. Filed Joint Motion to Extend Deadline for Fast Track Statement and Joint Appendix and Expansion of Respondents Type-Volume Limitation. Nos.85089/85370 (SC).
  33. Filed Order. The parties have filed a joint motion for an extension of time to file the fast track statement and for leave to file a fast track response in excess of the page limitation. This matter is removed from the fast track program. Douglas Gennardo shall have until March 20, 2023, to file and serve an appendix and an opening brief in Docket No. 85089. Natalie Gennardo shall have 21 days from service of the opening brief in Docket No. 85089 to file and serve a combined answering brief in Docket No. 85089 and opening brief in Docket No. 85370. Natalie's combined brief shall not exceed 40 pages or 18,500 words. Douglas shall have 21 days from service of Natalie's combined brief to file and serve a combined reply brief in Docket No. 85089 and answering brief in Docket No. 85370 that does not exceed 30 pages or 14,000 words. Natalie shall have 14 days from service of Douglas' combined brief to file and serve a reply brief in Docket No. 85370 that does not exceed 15 pages or 7,000 words. (SC)
  34. Filed Karla M. Soto's (Verbatim Reporting & Transcription) Motion for an Extension of time to file transcripts. Nos. 85089/85370. (SC)
  35. Filed Respondent's Motion for Instructions or for Limited Remand. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  36. Filed Respondent's Certificate of Service For Motion for Instructions or for Limited Remand. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  37. Filed Appellant's Joint Motion to Extend Time to file Fast Track Statement and Joint Appendix. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  38. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellant's response to respondent's motion filed on March 15, 2023, due: April 5, 2023. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  39. Filed Appellant's Opposition to Motion for Instructions or for Limited Remand. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  40. Filed Respondent's Reply to Response to Motion for Instructions or for Limited Remand. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  41. Filed Notice from Court Reporter. Maria Balagtas stating that the requested transcripts were delivered. Dates of transcripts: 02/08/22 & 01/06/22. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  42. Filed Joint Motion to Extend Deadline for Opening Brief and Joint Appendix. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)
  43. Filed Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal No. 85089 and Joint Motion to Return Appeal No. 85370 to Fast Track Rules and For Limited Remand to Approve Settlement of Financial Issues. Nos. 85089/85370 (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more