Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-16
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 159 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Chavez, Richard A
Photo of Hon. Pebet Noelle

Judge

Hon. Pebet Noelle

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  3. Paternity
  4. Proof of Service
  5. Comment Served: Richard A Chavez. Personal Service
  6. Return Letter
  7. Comment Answer to complaint, IED, Visitation Verification, Health Insurance Information and attachments received . returned to respondent
  8. Return Letter
  9. Comment FL-610/Answer-Service not completed, denied filing at this time.
  10. Answer Filed Family Support
  11. Notice of Motion
  12. Comment Judgment, CS, HC Other: Parentage, GT, Join Other parent / Hrg: Time: 8am Dept. 302
  13. Proof of Service by Mail
  14. Comment Served Respondent and Other Parent by Mail
  15. Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing
  16. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  17. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  18. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  19. Hearing Time 4:00 PM
  20. Result Heard
  21. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  22. Comment Party: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  23. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  24. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  25. Comment Party: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  26. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  27. Comment Emailed to: [email protected]
  28. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  29. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  30. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  31. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  32. Result Continued Party's Motion
  33. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  34. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  35. Motion Child Support
  36. Original Type Motion Child Support
  37. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  38. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  39. Result Continued Party's Motion
  40. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  41. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  42. Motion - Health Care
  43. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  44. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  45. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  46. Result Continued Party's Motion
  47. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  48. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  49. General Motion
  50. Original Type General Motion
  51. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  52. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  53. Result Continued Party's Motion
  54. Comment Parentage
  55. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  56. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  57. Motion - Genetic Test
  58. Original Type Motion - Genetic Test
  59. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  60. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  61. Result Continued Party's Motion
  62. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  63. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  64. Motion - Joinder
  65. Original Type Motion - Joinder
  66. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  67. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  68. Result Heard
  69. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  70. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  71. Appeared in Person
  72. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  73. Proof of Service by Mail
  74. Comment Mailed: Served: Richard A Chavez
  75. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  76. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  77. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  78. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  79. Result Continued Party's Motion
  80. Comment Cont'd from to allow notice of GT results / Resp auth Zoom / OP joined prev hrg / RJ 2/1/24 w/ iss of juris reserv
  81. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  82. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  83. Motion Child Support
  84. Original Type Motion Child Support
  85. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  86. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  87. Result Continued Party's Motion
  88. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  89. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  90. Motion - Health Care
  91. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  92. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  93. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  94. Result Continued Party's Motion
  95. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  96. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  97. Motion - Genetic Test
  98. Original Type Motion - Genetic Test
  99. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  100. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  101. Result Continued Party's Motion
  102. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  103. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  104. General Motion
  105. Original Type General Motion
  106. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  107. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  108. Result Continued Party's Motion
  109. Comment Parentage
  110. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  111. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  112. Appeared in Person
  113. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  114. Proof of Service by Mail
  115. Comment Mailed: Served: Richard A Chavez
  116. Proof of Service by Mail
  117. Comment Served: Shelby L Killough. Mailed on
  118. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  119. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  120. Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle
  121. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  122. Result Heard
  123. Comment Cont'd from to allow timely notice of GT results / RJ 2/1/24 (issue reserved) / Resp auth Zoom
  124. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  125. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  126. Motion Child Support
  127. Original Type Motion Child Support
  128. Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle
  129. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  130. Result Heard
  131. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  132. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  133. Motion - Health Care
  134. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  135. Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle
  136. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  137. Result Heard
  138. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  139. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  140. Motion - Genetic Test
  141. Original Type Motion - Genetic Test
  142. Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle
  143. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  144. Result Heard
  145. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  146. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  147. General Motion
  148. Original Type General Motion
  149. Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle
  150. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  151. Result Heard
  152. Comment Parentage
  153. Respondent: CHAVEZ, RICHARD A
  154. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  155. Appeared in Person
  156. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  157. Confidential document filed
  158. Comment Genetic Test Results
  159. Family Code 4065 Waiver

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more