Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Dallas County Civil

Court

Dallas County Civil

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-21
Status DISMISSED
Type Conv Js
Docket 24 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Gonkewon, Laurie
Defendant Moore, Danielle
Photo of Hon. Swartz, Adam M

Judge

Hon. Swartz, Adam M

Dallas County Civil

Texas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. 10/21/2022 NEW CASE FILED
  2. 10/21/2022 Cause Of Action Action CIVIL CAUSE OF ACTION File Date 10/21/2022
  3. 10/25/2022 CITATION ISSUE DATE Comment Agency: PL ATTY 11/22/22 citation returned due to court error
  4. 11/22/2022 CITATION Requested By MOORE, DANIELLE Served 12/09/2022 Anticipated Server PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER Anticipated Method OTHER Actual Server PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER Returned 12/16/2022
  5. 11/22/2022 CITATION ISSUED FOR PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER Comment REISSUED CITATION DUE TO TYPO IN PL NAME
  6. 12/23/2022 ANSWER Comment ATTY FILED ANS
  7. 02/10/2023 NEW ADDRESS UPDATE Comment NEW ADDRESS FOR ATTORNEY
  8. 02/16/2023 MOTION FOR DISCOVERY Comment DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY FILED
  9. 02/22/2023 NOTICE OF HEARING Comment NOTICE OF HEARING EMAILED TO ALL
  10. 02/28/2023 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  11. 03/06/2023 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE GRANTED Comment PL MOTN FOR CONTINUANCE GRANTED
  12. 03/23/2023 JURY DEMAND - $22
  13. 03/27/2023 MOTION HEARING Judicial Officer SWARTZ, ADAM M Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  14. 03/27/2023 MOTION FOR DISCOVERY GRANTED Comment WITHOUT A HEARING WITHOUT DEPOSITION
  15. 07/10/2023 DISCOVERY FILED - INTERROGATORIES
  16. 10/20/2023 MOTION (Other) Comment PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more