Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-11-16
Status Dismissed
Type Dafs
Docket 94 entries
Disposition dismissal of entire action

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Brisker, Lavell S
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  15. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  16. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  17. Result Continued Party's Motion
  18. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  19. Motion Child Support
  20. Original Type Motion Child Support
  21. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  22. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  23. Result Continued Party's Motion
  24. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  25. Motion - Health Care
  26. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  27. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  28. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  29. Result Continued Party's Motion
  30. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  31. General Motion
  32. Original Type General Motion
  33. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  34. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  35. Result Continued Party's Motion
  36. Comment Parentage
  37. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  38. Motion - Genetic Test
  39. Original Type Motion - Genetic Test
  40. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  41. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  42. Result Continued Party's Motion
  43. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  44. Motion - Joinder
  45. Original Type Motion - Joinder
  46. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  47. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  48. Result Continued Party's Motion
  49. Comment Join other parent
  50. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  51. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  52. Appeared in Person
  53. Proof of Service by Mail
  54. Comment Served: Lavell S Brisker and Dayja J Harris / Mailed on
  55. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  56. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  57. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  58. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  59. Result Heard
  60. Comment cont. to perfect service of GT results
  61. Motion Child Support
  62. Original Type Motion Child Support
  63. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  64. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  65. Result Heard
  66. Motion - Health Care
  67. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  68. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  69. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  70. Result Heard
  71. General Motion
  72. Original Type General Motion
  73. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  74. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  75. Result Heard
  76. Comment Parentage
  77. Motion - Genetic Test
  78. Original Type Motion - Genetic Test
  79. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  80. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  81. Result Heard
  82. Motion - Joinder
  83. Original Type Motion - Joinder
  84. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  85. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  86. Result Heard
  87. Respondent: BRISKER, LAVELL S
  88. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  89. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  90. Appeared in Person
  91. Confidential document filed
  92. Comment Genetic test results
  93. Dismissal of Entire Action
  94. Proof of Service by Mail

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more