Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-11-15
Status Dismissed
Type 36 Unlimited Wrongful Termination
Docket 109 entries
Disposition pending

Parties

Plaintiff Portillo, Monica Brigi
Defendant Chang, John|Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc|Beauty Systems Group, Llc
Photo of Hon. Skiles Jon M

Judge

Hon. Skiles Jon M

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  14. Proof of Service
  15. View Document 11-22-23 Proof of Service
  16. Summons and Complaint
  17. Served
  18. Answer Filed
  19. View Document 12-21-23 Answer
  20. Transfer of Fees Completed
  21. Comment FOR WEB-2023-90419
  22. Order Received for Signature
  23. View Document Stipulation for Binding Arbitration and Stay; [Proposed] Order
  24. Comment Signed and forwarded to clerks office FWD to 501 - Stipulation for Binding Arbitration and Stay; [Proposed] Order
  25. Chambers Work- Pre
  26. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  27. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  28. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  29. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  30. Chambers Work- Pre
  31. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  32. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  33. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  34. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  35. Notice or Order Staying Action
  36. View Document Notice or Order Staying Action
  37. Comment Joint Stipulation for Binding Arbitration and Stay of Action
  38. Notice of Hearing
  39. View Document Notice of Hearing
  40. Comment Arbitration Status Conference at 3:30 pm
  41. Case Management Conference
  42. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  43. Hearing Time 3:00 PM
  44. Cancel Reason Case Stayed
  45. Motion - Judgment on Plead
  46. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  47. Hearing Time 3:27 PM
  48. Cancel Reason Clerical Error
  49. Comment Arturo Rodriguez
  50. Statement filed
  51. View Document 8-20-24 Joint Arbitration Status
  52. Comment Joint Arbitration Status. Hearing 8-27-24
  53. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  54. View Document 8.23.24 Notice of Remote Appearance
  55. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  56. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  57. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  58. Hearing Time 5:32 PM
  59. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  60. Notice of Settlement filed
  61. View Document Notice of Settlement
  62. Comment No Action Taken - Stayed
  63. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  64. View Document - Notice of Remote Appearance
  65. Comment Party: Aram Rostomyan Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  66. Arbitration Status Conference
  67. Original Type Arbitration Status Conference
  68. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  69. Hearing Time 3:28 PM
  70. Result Heard
  71. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  72. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  73. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  74. Hearing Time 5:32 PM
  75. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  76. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  77. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  78. Comment Court date: 8-27-24 Party: Portillo, Monica Brigi Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  79. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  80. Comment Mailed/Emailed to: [email protected]
  81. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  82. Minute Order Attachment
  83. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  84. Comment and CM
  85. On Courts own motion - remote appearance authorized
  86. Comment for the next hearing
  87. Dismissal Not Entered
  88. View Document - Request for Full Dismissal
  89. Comment Request for dismissal filed. Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reason: STAY was not lifted until 11-19-2024.
  90. Arbitration Status Conference
  91. Original Type Arbitration Status Conference
  92. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  93. Hearing Time 3:28 PM
  94. Result Heard
  95. Comment Zoom authorized
  96. Minute Order Attachment
  97. View Document 11.19.24 Minute Order Attachment &CM
  98. Comment and CM
  99. On Courts own motion - remote appearance authorized
  100. Comment for the next status conference
  101. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  102. Notice or Order Vacating Stay
  103. Comment Per Min. Ord.
  104. Request for Dismissal Received - Pending Review
  105. View Document Request for Full Dismissal
  106. Arbitration Status Conference
  107. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  108. Hearing Time 3:28 PM
  109. Cancel Reason Dismissed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more