Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-04
Status Judgment
Type 26 Cv Other Real Property Civil Unlimited
Docket 26 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Moore, Carol Riley
Defendant All Persons Unknown Claiming Any Legal Or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien, Or Interest In The Property Described In The Complaint Adverse To Plaintiff's Title, Or Creates Any Cloud Upon Plaintiff's Title Thereto
Photo of Hon. Non, Fast Track

Judge

Hon. Non, Fast Track

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 04/22/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: L
  2. Unserved
  3. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Comment Ex Parte Application for Order Authorizing Service by Publication
  4. Comment Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Order Authorizing Service by Publication
  5. Comment Declaration of Elizabeth Estrada in Support of Ex Parte Application for Order Authorizing Svc. by Publication
  6. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  7. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  8. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  12. Comment Letter to Commissioner Cervantes Re Proposed Judgment for Quiet Title
  13. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Proposed Judgment - Per Commissioner a Default Judgment in a Quiet Title action requires a Prove-up hearing per CCP 7694.010
  14. Comment Prove-up hearing set June 21, 2024 D-L
  15. Comment Plaintiff's Case Management Statement, 7/03/24, 8:30 a.m., Div. L (No Proof of Svc. Attached)
  16. Comment Prove-up hearing set for June 26,2024 @ 8:30am D-L
  17. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 08:30 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment Prove-up
  18. View Document Default 06/26/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Held Comment Prove-up
  19. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) View Document Default 07/03/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  20. View Document Default 07/03/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Held Comment Prove-Up Continued from 06/26/24
  21. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Comment for Quiet Title
  22. Comment of Elizabeth Estrada Re. Amended Judgment
  23. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  24. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Clerical Error Comment Continued from 01/31/2024,04/02/2024,07/03/2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more